Reply With Quotei wish a boxed copy of Fight Fight on Sega CD wasn't so pricey
You can't fight nostalgia and expect to win.
Half-man, half-amazing
i wish a boxed copy of Fight Fight on Sega CD wasn't so pricey
Isn't Sega CD the worst way to play it anything?
incorrect.
(but these days I don’t know why you would play an arcade port instead of emulation).
Special cases where the port was significantly changed for the better notwithstanding e.g. nes contra, etc.
I think Final Fight CD is different enough from the arcade game although the hit timing/animation still bothers me for feeling a bit off. I like playing various versions of games, though. Even though better versions exist, I love playing the ultra-pixelly Mega CD port of Night Striker. It has a certain charm to it.
Last edited by NeoZeedeater; 30 Jan 2018 at 05:49 PM.
There's something to seeing how different console teams interpreted their ports. There's often a disconnect between graphic fidelity and gameplay fidelity for sure, sometimes the better graphic'd ports completely whiff the gameplay.
SNES ports tend to come off as really sluggish, even when they look better.
Originally Posted by Razor Ramon
Half-man, half-amazing
yeah, missing bits (hagar's suplex, i wanna say) aside, i thought the CD version was tons better than the SNES one at least
and yeah, we all have MAME but i dig ports. like, i still play & defend the genesis one of Punisher, even though that's apparently out of style
I like the SegaCD port, it is a bit washed out but the game feels good.
I like kicking it with the Sega CD version, the arcade one isn't well suited for couch play.
Oh come on, the game just looks like it was made by retarded monkeys:
http://rs238.pbsrc.com/albums/ff172/...ight1.gif~c200
I took all your French Toast.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks