I think there just needs to be a broader effort to discourage and punish vexatious litigation in general, but the judicial industry would just find a way to spin that into even more lawsuits and filing fees.
Yeah, if that's the reason for the Technically Correct party to support dropping/gutting ADA requirements, that's laughably flimsy.
I think there just needs to be a broader effort to discourage and punish vexatious litigation in general, but the judicial industry would just find a way to spin that into even more lawsuits and filing fees.
SLAPPs especially need addressed. A SLAPP filer doesn't expect to win, but they instead plan to burden the defendant with bullshit legal defense costs until they are silenced.
The USA should adopt the English Rule for the legal system, like nearly all Western democracies do. Loser pays.
I think that would probably deter SLAPPs, if the defendant were to fight back knowing the plaintiff didn't have jack shit on them. Defendant wins, & ends up off the hook while the plaintiff chokes on the legal bills from both sides. Fair enough.
Ah, it's been a long 3 months.
So... is this an admission that Russia was a dead end?
Originally Posted by rezo
maybe in bizarro world, I guess
whatever floats your boat
Maybe it’s related. Cash for access is nothing new. It’s why the Clinton Foundation was so controversial. But she wasn’t an active president. I’m unsure why Joust keeps thinking every update of this wet fart of a story is big news.
Originally Posted by rezo
Bookmarks