Quote:
Originally posted by diffusionx
SC: influence follows the numbers. IF the numbers shift, like they have been, then we will see a power shift in the industry.
I mean, look at it: in past generations, it was always Japanese games that had gamer's hearts and minds... and sales dollars. Mario. Zelda. Resident Evil. Castlevania. Now, its Grand Theft Auto 3. A Western game. While all the games I mentioned above have what, 1/10th of the influence they used to (they certainly have more than 1/10th of the sales, but...).
Numbers mean a lot. A lot lot lot lot. After all, Im studying mathematics.
I see your point and it is viable. The same things has happened to many industries and I'm not saying your wrong and it won't happen to the Japanese. However, in my opinion, the game market will continue to stay rooted in Japan, at least for the near future. Japan is a strong market, but I think in your obsession with numbers, you may be overlooking other aspects that might factor in. Cultural and societal circumstances also play a big role. Melf mentions how the Japanese shun most foreign products. So it only makes sense that the XBox is doing poorly for that factor alone, even though it isn't the only factor. Japan is also in the middle of an economic slump, so when you see game sales are down, it is not necessarily attributed to declining interest in the Japanese market. Perhaps I'm giving the Japanese market too much credit, but as I see it, the credit is entirely warranted. They have the strongest companies, they have a devoted user base, and therefore, they have, in my opinion, the strongest market. The U.S. is becoming stronger, but I don't think video games in the U.S. are near where they are in Japan. I'm just saying that it's foolish to ignore the Japanese market, just as it would be foolish to ignore the American or European markets. But as we've seen from games that haven't been released over here, Japanese game companies don't always consider the American or European markets when making a game. The U.S. companies, like M$, do. I may been a little off on this, but it's how I see it and I think it's a fair view on the situation.