Grabbed by the Ghoulies

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jeremy

The game looks interesting via the gameplay vids I saw from E3. The game's visual look is a bit cartoony, and doesn't appeal to me due to the generic look of the characters. Funny how I don't see you defending your opinions on games all that often. You seem to spend more time demanding that others defend theirs.

---

That would be because I don't say "Wow, this game looks cool!" in one breath and "It looks like SHIT, huh guys?" as soon as someone else offers a different opinion. If your opinion was your own, I wouldn't ask you to defend it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by diffusionx

I really dont think Rare put too much time or effort into this game, likely it was something that Microsoft told them to whip up so they can start putting shit out with the Rare name on it... kinda like how, when Nintendo was facing a weak winter, told Rare to hurry up with the Diddy Kong Racing. Ill give them the benefit of the doubt this time.

---

The difference is, both of their Nintendo 64 "rushed" games were still great games, DKR and Blastcorps (moreso Blastcorps than DKR).

With Star Fox Adventures, Banjo Kazooie: Grunty's Revenge and Grabbed by the Ghoulies... Rare are on a definate decline. Let's hope they pick up their game.

There's a difference between saying the gameplay looks good and saying the graphics and visual look don't. With you being the uber-genius that you are, I'm surprised you couldn't figure that out. Also, folks were saying the game (both gameplay-wise and visually) looked like shit when it was first seen, so don't give me ANY of that opinion-changing on a dime bullshit you and others like to fall back on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jeremy

There's a difference between saying the gameplay looks good and saying the graphics and visual look don't. With you being the uber-genius that you are, I'm surprised you couldn't figure that out. Also, folks were saying the game (both gameplay-wise and visually) looked like shit when it was first seen, so don't give me ANY of that opinion-changing on a dime bullshit you and others like to fall back on.

---

Again.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jeremy

"Shit" is a great word to use in a sentence about GbtG's visual look though, is it not?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jeremy earlier in the thread...

It looks interesting...

---

Not the gameplay looks interesting, not the controller looks interesting, and not the tv I might play it on. It looks interesting. Appears or seems interesting. Not "it looks interesting, although it looks like shit." It doesn't take a genius to see that your opinion changes like a stream of piss in the wind.

Goddamn are you a pompous asshole.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jeremy

Goddamn are you a pompous asshole.

---

Do not post a reply if your sole intent is to belittle someone, disrupt a conversation, or just be contrary. Attacking ideas is fine; attacking other members is not. Back up any attacks with supporting evidence (not just more attacks) and you should be all right. Name-calling and personal accusations should be confined to Fight Club, but no excessive personal attacks will be allowed to stand anywhere on the boards.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mzo

I'll eventually get it off the retail website for free. No worries.

---

That's exactly how I got mine. It's a good game.

Funny how those rules don't apply every time you or OMFGNinjas flame someone.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jeremy

Funny how those rules don't apply every time you or OMFGNinjas flame someone.

---

Are you just trying to be contrary and personally attack board members?

No, if that was the case, my board name would be "OMFGNinjas."