Rosa Parks V. Outkast

Age doesn't prohibit greed.

She settles, it's about money.
She settles for only her lawyers cost and an apology, it's not.

I'm betting on #1.

I'm betting they either agree to change the name or she looses in court. Either way WTF is she gonna do with millions of dollars? Die, and that's really about it. Also if she gives it to various black charities after settling then it was never about the money either.

I assume she has a family, she could give it to them, which would still be greed.

I doubt she'll give it away to a charity, but we'll have to wait and see.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr-K

I would understand if the song sucked.

---

I always hated that song, its corny as hell.

As far as Rosa Parks suing, she should be happy to see young brothas doing well.

So, since I'm white, does that mean I should feel happy when I see white people do well?

I'd be all Hush that Fuss bitch. Hush it!

Actually the case has been floating around courts for more than 3 years or so.

I think this may actually be round 2 as well.

Yeah, they said it happened in 1999. Then somebody appealed a lot, and now it's in the Supreme Court.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr-K

What does she care? I would understand if the song sucked. I wouldn't mind having a good Outkast song named after me.

---

They'd need to make a good song, first.