That's what Im saying. And S-Video should be the packed-in connector, not composite.Quote:
It should not be supported in the next gen systems.
Printable View
That's what Im saying. And S-Video should be the packed-in connector, not composite.Quote:
It should not be supported in the next gen systems.
That, despite the fact that S-video is not yet the standard, causing folks to spend $10-$15 for something that usually comes with the systems.
They should get new TVs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeremy
Or at least, 7-year old TVs.
Yeah, it would sure set the standard for what the next gen is supposed to look like. It'd be nice if they did that too, so I'd finally see my friends ditch the 70's Panasonic monitor for something new. Old tv's dont do justice for all the stuff coming out these days.Quote:
Originally Posted by diffusionx
People using RF means they are too back water to know any better... hell when will we be able to get a switch box/av selector with more then 4-8 inputs...
Considering that your lucky to get two inputs on your t.v, s-video or component.
Yeah, I disagree with the S-Video as well... it may be better than composite, but my TV before I got a new one had only one S-Video input, but 4 inputs alltogether. When I have more than one system, I didn't want to have to keep switching the S-Video, and then again for my DVD player. I had my DVD player in the S-Video and the rest stayed with the standard AV cables because that was the most convenient.
Quote:
Originally Posted by diffusionx
Even better, it should just be the Standard farking connector on the back of the console.
Get a switcher-box.Quote:
Originally Posted by TobalRox
You misread me, I said that this was how it used to be. I now have a new TV, and I have everything hooked up by component cables. Do they have switcher boxes for component though?Quote:
Originally Posted by Videodrone