I don't know that I agree - I think alot of the best comics ever have been superhero stories. The hero myth is archetypal, symbolic, representational of the synthesis of the spirit. In the hands of a guy like Grant Morrison, who gets that and treats it all like hermetic alchemy, the superheroic characters lend a transubstantiative teleology to the story.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaneda
Even his Justice League stories had a metaphysical sub(or should that be meta?)narrative; he's writing Superman as Apollo and subversively (well, if you're not paying attention, anyway) initiating the reader into the 4-colour equivalent of a hellenic mystery cult. Look up his ideas on comics as hypersigils. His notions of superheroes as antediluvian imago line up almost exactly with Carl Jung's concepts of the archetypes as foundations of the unsconscious.
But yeah, for your average writer who's just trying to show Underoos Man can beat up Dr. Crime and spewing as much sexual frustration and power fantasy onto the page as possible - or worse, trying to blandly imitate some action movie or tv show - it really sucks. But that has as much to do with the bulk of the audience as anything else. More people would rather watch Jim Lee draw the same three scowling figures over & over again (with tons of detail !!") than read Heavy Liquid.
Mostly I just hate the X-Men because the over-complex plots stopped making sense 15 years ago & can only be followed if you buy 22 crappy X-Men comics a month, and the characters are largely sulky crypto-pubescents going through the endless motions of a nobody-in-highschool-likes-me ("a world that hates and fears us!") subnarrative.
Even still, I guess there's nothing wrong with reading something lighter if you're just after escapism. Everyone needs that from time to time.
