Alexander

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maruchan

I haven’t seen the film, but if the blatant homosexual relationship was their. Maybe he should have gone in the route of Spartacus, it had both homosexual, and very political parts in it..

---

Spartacus was also handled by Stanley Fucking Kubrick.

Well, to some extent.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr-K

What in the bloody fuck makes Oliver Stone so well esteemed? He's a terrible. Terrible director.

---

Platoon

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by diffusionx

Ill take Alexander as some sort of Rambo for antiquity than the crap Stone gave us.

PROPHESIZE THIS! *cuts the prophet's head off after he gives Alexander a prediction he doesnt like*

Cmon, it could work.

---

"To be, or not to be?"

BOOOMM!!!

"Not to be...."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gohron

Platoon

---

Born on the Fourth of July and The Doors were also good. Everything else he's done is fucking terrible.

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0...1.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
Apparently the "director's cut" refers to all the gay scenes (being cut out).

For any of the purists out there, a 2-disc theatrical edition is also coming out (of the closet).

:yuck: pass.

On another note, I saw on the news last night that Oliver Stone got arrested for having all kinds of drugs and pills on his possession and being under the influence while driving.Is it safe to assume that Oliver being Stoned is why Alexander sucked so bad? Or I guess he could've just turned to the drugs after realizing he turned such a great story in history into such a horrible movie.

So wait, there are gay scenes in this? With Colin Farrel? I am so there!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jetman

Is it safe to assume that Oliver being Stoned is why Alexander sucked so bad?

---

I wouldn't be surprised if he was on something for every movie he's made.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by animegirl

So wait, there are gay scenes in this? With Colin Farrel? I am so there!

---

It'd definitely make the movie worth watching.