Street Fighter Alpha 3: Double Uppercut

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sl1p

Street Fighter Alpha 3 is a busted piece of shit that should be flung into space for the crimes it has committed against humanity.

When the second player is capable of feats that the first player, who is playing the exact same character, is not capable of due to pure shitty programming, this is what we call piss poor design.

No other Street Fighter can make this claim. Hell, not even something like Time Killers can make this claim. Thus, Street Fighter Alpha 3 is the worst fighitng game ever made.

---

You are one spoiled son of a bitch. Alpha 3 was not that bad,

Stop trying to be like Yoshi.

God forbid something isn't as deep or unapproachable as SFIII. You'd have to be crazy to just like a game because you can pick it up and play it with friends that are doing the same thing! You know, I like SFIII, but there's a place for simpler games too.. this is why Marvel vs. Capcom 2 still gets played by me and all my friends. It's like Virtua Fighter and something like Soul Calibur or DOA.. One is really deep and I love to play it, but most of my friends don't, so I end up playing more of the others since they are easier for the casual gamer to pick up and play.

I am spoiled because Alpha 3 is one of the most poorly programmed fighting games of all time and I do not enjoy it.

According to TNL-Logic, Bubsy 3D is now the greatest 3D platformer of all time.

CVS2 has 2 player only glitches, as does guilty gear, and I thought there was a very minor one with SFIII too. It really has to do with priority of placement for CVS2 and guilty gear though. (the game defaults to a certain character being in the corner verses the other, player 2 in both games I think gets to cross up certain times when the other cannot.)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChaoofNee

Wait, what?

---

Yeah, I'm confused.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TobalRox

You know, I like SFIII, but there's a place for simpler games too.. this is why Marvel vs. Capcom 2 still gets played by me and all my friends.

---

I do not understand this sentence as SF3 is practically the essence of simple while MvC2 is just overloaded with all kinds of shit you have to keep track of and know about to even begin to play well.

If you're talking about 3rd strike being simple, you've a long ways to go before you make that claim. Some of the combo vids really prove you have to know you're stuff brefore you can even play anyone on an even level.

FLASHBACK

I've heard this argument before.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hugmuffin

I do not understand this sentence as SF3 is practically the essence of simple while MvC2 is just overloaded with all kinds of shit you have to keep track of and know about to even begin to play well.

---

I don't want to get off track, but I found SF3 Third Strike as something that took quite a bit of time to get into, learning all the moves, timing of a parry, etc... whereas MvC2 you can just mash buttons and win. I beat it without continuing on my 2nd time playing the game in the arcades.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TobalRox

I don't want to get off track, but I found SF3 Third Strike as something that took quite a bit of time to get into, learning all the moves, timing of a parry, etc... whereas MvC2 you can just mash buttons and win. I beat it without continuing on my 2nd time playing the game in the arcades.

---

Since when are you suppose to "beat" a fighting game in the first place? Single player games in the fighting genre (sans a few creative gems like VF4: Evo) are filler. Your point is moot.