It's not the tie, it's the generally crude, primitive design. Like if you let your little brother draw the character, and all the components were there, it would still look like shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by burgundy
In DK's defense a lot of 3D game designs looked like shit back then, but Rare, for some reason, never outgrew this.
Go ahead and find any pre-94 DK art that's remotely aesthetically appealing.Quote:
Originally Posted by NeoZeedeater
Like I said, feel free to hate the tie or the Rare design, but let's not pretend that there was any DK character to ruin. If anything, Rare should be applauded for taking a forgotten Nintendo classic and bringing him back into the limelight, your opinion of the game itself notwithstanding.
DK is the only decent character design Rare's ever done. But how could anyone fuck up something as simple as a gorilla with a tie?
I thought they did a good job with the lead character in that Goldeneye game, myself.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolemite
If you ignore everything in Conker.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolemite
Battletoads, yes?
List of Rare games: http://www.rareware.com/games/timeli...e_content.html
To go on a tangent, I never understood the Pac-man character (re-)design they made for the original US cab.Quote:
Originally Posted by burgundy
http://arcadecontrols.com/images/mar...uee_PacMan.jpg
If you think the original DK was meant to be anything other than menacing you are retarded.Quote:
Originally Posted by burgundy
If you're 35 and you ever found DK anything in the ballpark of menacing, you are a huge oozing vagina.
Ment to be or was?