In addition having "The Gun is smoking" clearly visible in the headline shows this was an unbiased report fo sho.
get real.
Printable View
In addition having "The Gun is smoking" clearly visible in the headline shows this was an unbiased report fo sho.
get real.
The paper was peer-reviewed by PhDs in math and statistics. Besides, anyone with a month in probability class can tell you those results stink.
Also, that is just one problem of many. Stop smearing me with this bullshit when I provide evidence you ask for.
I'm not smearing you Diff at all, if anything you always smear me, I retort and you cry.
So what your saying is a PHD can't be bias, did you go to college? In Michigan 80% of our profs were liberal to the bone, not quasi-liberal, but socialist liberal, who would do anything to smear a conservative, and I assume this number jumps on the West Coast. You are intelligent and I am sure you knew I was going to say that.
I refute your evidence, it doesn't work for me, it wouldn't work in the supreme court, it's heresay, that's all it is.
You say the election was rigged in Ohio, I say it wasn't, neither one of us need to waste anymore time as we are not going to convince each other to see our respective points of view.
Every mathematician I ever met at UCLA (and my degree is in Math, by the way) put their trade and their science above their politics. You don't fuck with the math. I don't doubt there are liberal nuts in other departments but not at the math one.
And this is not heresay, it is solid, grounded, mathematical proof. Solid statistical analysis. It really can't get much more solid. If you want to dismiss it that is fine but it's not because there's a problem with the evidence.
And also, Kerry wasn't "my candidate".
THERE is a problem with the evidence Diff. It's not going hold up in the court of law, that's 101 stuff man. Unless you can prove to me that every person who touched this report didn't have an agenda, I can't accept this as being valid. If I put some skewed numbers that greatly favor the Conservative tax breaks that was done by Stephen Hawking you would dispute it. It's politics.
Diff, I don't even know why you bother.
http://www.electharris.org/multimedi...kickoff_11.jpg
:yuck:
He did the same thing Nixon did after Kennedy supposedly stole the 1960 election: conceeded gracefully to spare the nation any more electoral trauma, especially after the disgusting fiasco that was the 2000 election.