Why did you post that shitty band's myspace page?
Printable View
I warned ya.
As for the rest of the shit that comes out of your mouth:
I am STILL hung like a horse and damn I look good with my huge schlong while enjoying being VINDICATED.
How long before you gona start threatening me again like you did when I urged for restraint and asked for confirmation those dozen or so times you posted ALMACI OWNZORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD WMD FOUND?
What the hell?
So Stone to this day still agrees with the following things from this thread: http://www.the-nextlevel.com/board/s...ht=the+Victory
The following are all stone quotes:
1.) The market is way smarter than you.
2.) If the war was going to help Halliburton, then Halliburton's stock would go up.
3.) The stock isn't going up.
4.) The war isn't going to help Halliburton.
Can we even argue about that?
-----------------------
You, Almaci, are the worst, most ignorant person I've ever met on a messageboard.
----------------------------------------
Oh, and no chemical weapons, you say? Where are Iraq's weapons of mass destruction? Saddam was disarming?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,81935,00.html
Fuck all of you morons who doubted that Iraq had them - go ahead and call this more propaganda if you'd like, I don't give a shit.
--------------------------------
My reply: I truly hope that this turns out to be another case of SCUD envy and that this also soon will be disproven.
After al if it turns out to be fake the likelyhood of such weapons being used on civilians and millitary decreases exponantially.
Stone again: Heh, yeah, that's why you hope that the report is fake. You sicken me.
Just turned on MSNBC, and Forrest Sawyer said something like "I caution you all very severely, but this might be the news Bush has been waiting for. The coalition has found a building that may be producing chemicals of some sort. What sort, we don't know." And, shit, it's like he can't bear to even think of Saddam having chemical weapons - I understand the need to be careful, but this is ridiculous.
What's the likelihood of a non-military chemical factory having an Iraqi general in charge and sand-colored camoflauge facing on the outsides of the building?
-----------------------------------
How would this apply? Missiles were fired and shot down by patriots... Early reports said they were SCUDs, others said they were al-samuds or FROGS (whatever).. There was an issue with the TYPE of missile that was used, not the fact that they were fired and shot down (the TYPE of missile was disproven, NOT the whole story, geez)... In this case, the missiles NOT being SCUDs (cause you saw reports stating they weren't) was so important to you that you had to harass Jimmy about it, as well as aggravate others - myself included...
Again, this wasn't propoganda, guys on the ground made a mistake or jumped the gun on the TYPE of missile which was used... The Pentagon cleared it up, so end of story - all "confirmations" on the TYPE of missile now seem to match... Btw, I heard on NPR today that it the was British that reported 30 oil well fires early on, which you used in your reasoning to claim the US media is just full of propoganda... The count was lowered to 5, now it's reportedly 10 fires... I just don't get why you couldn't have waited a little while longer on it, and why it was sooo important that the type of missile NOT be a SCUD. How it took higher priority in your mind regarding the TYPE of missile it was, while people are getting killed on both sides I find so odd...
--------------------------------
These were just a few quotes from the FIRST TO PAGES.
Check the thread itself to see what a complete and total fucktard he was and apparently still is since he still believes the shit he typed back then to be correct.
Nobody cares man. Life's too short to hold on to a grudge this long.
Good game.
gg guys. GG.