jesus fucking christ.
i'm not going to waste the time explaining, just reread the fucking thread.
Printable View
jesus fucking christ.
i'm not going to waste the time explaining, just reread the fucking thread.
Gee, people don't want to spend $600 for a videogame console. What a suprise!
No one wants a next gen DVD players. Even the people that think they want them don't. It's useless technology. A nice DVD player that can filter to 1080i looks virtually indistinguishable from an HD-DVD as far as the average consumer is concerned. And most people don't have large HDTVs that would justify it even if they did have eagle eyes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brand X
Shocked! Yes, I am fucking shocked that Sony is able to manufacture more $600 doorstops than people are willing to buy!
Such manufacturing prowess on display....
I'll still buy a PS3 once it goes to $300.
Yes. By the time it goes to $300 it'll have a couple hundred games worth playing. I'm sure Sony can move a $300 game system easier than a $600 doorstop.Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor Ramon
I agreed with this until I actually used a next gen DVD player. Even the menus are 100x nicer. The whole format is just completely superior to DVD.Quote:
Originally Posted by Frogacuda
You forgot the price of the correct cables to get PS3 to display HD. I'd also argue that the HD DVD doesn't factor in because it's totally optional and if you want wireless internet you can get a bridge for much cheaper than $100.Quote:
Originally Posted by JesusC
Even that comparison isn't dead on though. The $600 PS3 has 40 more GBs of HDD space. There isn't a way to get completely equal configurations, since the 20GB PS3 doesn't have WiFi.Quote:
Originally Posted by JesusC
Who gives a shit about the menus? And I've seen them. The difference is not that great. Most people in blind tests can't tell the difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshi