They must have like, gave them all a twenty and a diet coke and went back and reshot the ending
Like, did you catch that they were pulling the cable through shut doors?
That is the cheapest obvious reshot I've ever seen
Printable View
They must have like, gave them all a twenty and a diet coke and went back and reshot the ending
Like, did you catch that they were pulling the cable through shut doors?
That is the cheapest obvious reshot I've ever seen
Also, do you think the blu ray is going to have the cut thriller dance in it?
Yeah, the whole credits dance thing should have been part of the movie. I actually liked all the Kevin jokes, outside of the 10 minute awful Mike Hat improv.
I'm still reeling from how awful the improv was. So cringey.
Unrelated, but this article came out for the new movie
http://www.laweekly.com/arts/ivan-re...ations-7091436
It is about the differences in the two original fire houses, and the differences between shooting in NY and LA.
I'm glad to hear they saved the LA location. There was talk of knocking it down not too long ago.
Just saw it. I really hope they make another. I really liked the cast, even notegon! And a few jokes I LOL at, one I couldn't stop.
But I hope this losing money never lets Paul Feig direct another movie. God he's awful. There is no suspense or tension and jokes are ruined because he doesn't know where to put a camera or how long to let a shot build tension. Things just happen. There are also jokes that never would have worked and needed to be cut. This is 2 stars but should have been 4 or 5.
He very well might be the biggest problem
That and whomever cut it
I did laugh at the Oprah car joke
That joke is always funny though
Wasn't this Feig's highest opening movie, though? Maybe not enough considering the budget, but not a flop.
The movie was 100% comedy, there was something for everyone to laugh at. It didn't really do anything dramatic to make me care about any of the characters, though. I starting watching old episodes of the Simpsons. That show was stellar at throwing a ton of silly at the viewer, but bringing just enough seriousness into a situation to make you care for the characters.
This film critic I like breaks what you just said down real nice.
Being 100% comedy is part of the problem. The orginal could have survived on action. Or a movie on a business start up. There was like 3 movies in there to entertain you. 4 if you count the romance. Which is great, because if a joke fell flat it usually helped the other 3 or 4 storylines.
Like if you didn't laugh at "that's a big coxkroach" whatever, it built the scene for the later action.
Jokes about queefs didn't really do that.