Bullshit. You're still backpedaling, out one side of your mouth you slam people condemning torture by talking about all the horrible things terrorists did to us and how 'hey we've been doing it forever' and now out of the other you feign outrage and talk about how you'd never think of condoning it, when you already did. You're a conscious fraud and if you're waiting for an apology then get comfy, because it ain't fucking coming.
Dude, you're an asshole for creating an argument that wasn't there and creating a position that I didn't take.
I might as well make the argument that you love torture, hate the U.S. government, and are secretly a communist mole on a video game message board.
Congratulations on being a complete ignoramus. You win.
Edit: And just so we're completely clear: The actions of terrorism were described by me to address "rules of war" that don't exist and in no way, shape, or form were used to justify the use of torture as a means to an end. What you're reading into isn't there and wasn't intended and I have absolutely no reason to lie to an adrenaline pumped hate mongering zealot such as you. What do I care what you think? I DO care, however, you telling people what I think - particularly when it's flat out wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by haohmaru
Oh yeah, because the people in Iraq have been responsible for that right.
Seriously you twit, after 6 years of government lies, propaganda and mismanagment you STILL use that tired old disproven line?
Simply pathetic.
Huh what?Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff
Your ignorance is truly bliss.
Oh, great. Another dolt who forgot to take reading comprehension.
So, there aren't suicide bombers blowing up shit in Iraq, Israel and Afghanistan? That's been "disproven"? By whom, exactly? Are you next going say that the Holocaust has been "disproven" and that Christians weren't fed to Lions and that Muslims are really being treated fairly by the United States?
And, just so we're crystal clear, nothing in my statement has anything to do with the war in Iraq either.
Are those soldiers engaged in war or terrorists using terror to achieve chaos?
Was the UK IN WAR for 4 decades with Ireland or Northern Island(part of the UK at that) or was it a government against a terrorist group?
Hows about Germany and the Rote armee fraction?
Belgium and the CCC?
Was the US at war with itself with its homegrown terrorists in the 60s and 70s?
Big distinctions no?
Oh BTW, regarding Iraq.
How many suicide attacks and Al Queda members where there before you guys barged in on false pretense?
Go on, enlighten me.
How many attacks have hit the US since 9/11? I'd say we're doing the job.
How many suicide attacks...? Isn't one, just one, too many when we're discussing the "rules of war"?
I'm not going to turn this into an Almaci Iraq war debate. That's not what my statement was about - it was addressing a particular post that talked about the war having rules and me saying that that doesn't exist. I used suicide bombers as an example. I can use the U.S.'s condoning certain methods of torture as another violation. War is awful and what it does to innocent people are awful - whatever side you're on.
Hmmm, let's ask the Kurds, Israel, and Kuwait that question, k? I love how Almaci is backing a nation AND a terrorist group that believes genocide is a useful and acceptable solution, this debate is over, he's a zealot or he's coming off that way to get a rise out of people. Don't need to get banned for this one :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Almaci
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff
The sniper case, Anthrax, another plane that flew in an appartment building, attack at El Al counter at LAX and these are just from memory.
Thats way more then the years predating 9/11.