Printable View
I know that. Maybe I should have used a smiley there. :( I just wanted to point out what a douch Gingrich is.
The same thing happened here some years back when then-governor Rosselló used an interview with a reporter in his ad. The reporter sued him for using his likeness without permission, and the station threatened action for using the interview either way. They had to pull the ad within a week or so after it went up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbobb
Bullshit. In nine months they'd like nothing more than to help Obama. Brokaw is about as partial as it gets, so his image could only be hurt in the eyes of the similarly partial. Maybe Romney can find some old Dan Rather material...Quote:
Originally Posted by Brisco Bold
Bullshit, if it were Obama trying to use this same footage against Gingrich they wouldn't allow it either.
Nah. They really want to be impartial. In this case it really is an issue of journalistic integrity.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshi
Fuck NBC. It's Romney's ad money, he can do whatever he wants with it.
If you're basing your vote on TV advertisements, you're dumb, anyway.
Elections are always decided by TV advertisements.
They should all be like that creepy ass Hermain Cain ad.
Your troll veil is getting pretty thin. It's obviously NBC's intellectual property. Are you just ignoring that? And more people watch TV than read a newspaper so you'd be an idiot if you didn't put ad dollars on TV commercials.Quote:
Originally Posted by jyoung
This is the problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by dave is ok
After last night's primary, is Newt even relevant anymore? The margin seemed pretty decisive; I'm happy that Mitt seems to be getting stronger majorities.
But in the end, he's just gonna be Republican-flavored 2004 John Kerry.