How about you download it instead!
Printable View
Then it's $30 for something I don't own.
Unless you're referring to another type of download which would be free of course.
But if I want to watch a movie or show badly enough, I'm happy to pay for it. I'll just wait until it hits a price point that I'm happy to pay.
God, that short circuit remake is going to be so horrible. The robot is probably going to look like a big CG talking Ipod and be voiced by Robin Williams.
I've never seen any Jackass and I saw both of the other Transformers. The second one I was dragged to and I swore to myself never again in solemn and defeated reflection. Even in Avatar 3D seemed kind of pointless. I would have taken off my glasses if my regular old eyeballs didn't see it blurred that way. It's completely a gimmick because it never, not once, is integral to the plot or subtext. I mean I guess you can add emphasis on a particular character for being MORE 3D! than the others but what's the basis? It's silly. It's just an added experience if, you know, like that sort of thing. But 3D is heralded as the second coming of Christ, and all who do not seek the warmth of its refuge are unwashed heathens. No thanks.
I would strangle somebody to death with my bare hands if The Duke appeared to me in a dream and ordered me to. But Jeff Bridges' portrayal of Rooster made the movie completely different. Also the ending was actually the ending as scribed in the novel - not Wayne showing everyone how he can jump over a million fences at once riding bare-back on a horse shooting a Winchester. I'm undecided which was better but glad I have the option to confound me.
3:10 to Yuma was kind of not good in a lot of ways. I love the genre so I went. Otherwise I would have forgotten about it.
I'm very suspicious that 3D is nothing but an effort from the electronics industry to push another surge of growth due to product upgrades. They got a big surge from Y2K, then people going to HD and streaming media. I wonder if 3DHD is effort to force another consumer buy in due to tv upgrading. And I say forced, because unlike Y2K and HD tv, it doesn't seem like a product that consumers particularly care about (comparatively speaking).
I think 3D is retarded but I have to address something:
Jackass 3D made $170,256,125 at the box office.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheebs
Dark of the Moon made $1,106,614,219 at the box office.
Avatar made $2,782,275,172 at the box office.
Cheebs is the stupidest fucking person ever.
He was saying that he felt that Transformers and Jackass did 3D better than Avatar.
It's still fucking stupid but I don't know why you're posting box office dollars.
I could write a book about all the shit you don't know.
I'd like to think that comparing those movies based on financial success is the best way to do it, since the inclusion of 3D was a purely financial decision, so I kind of took it in a slightly different direction. Really though, if Avatar really did have worse 3D than Transformers it doesn't give a fuck, because coming out first even with worse 3D is probably responsible for a huge chunk of that 1.7 billion difference.
You shouldn't need to pull up a cheebs post from last night and force the wrong context onto it to prove that he's retarded.