Originally Posted by
Bojack
Allright! Eugenics for the poor! People that need welfare will still be born though.
Although it's curious that you're against abortion unless rape or incest or life of mother (all presumably based on what you said) which means that the voluntarity of the conception is more important to you than the life of the kid. The few who are against abortion 100% actually have a superior stance than you and others who think this way because they are not hung up on the voluntarity of the sex.
You can act all pro kid and giving every kid a chance then why not force rape victims to carry to term? Don't rape babies deserve that 1 first chance (regardless of how lousy the chance is)?
The end result is that regardless of the myriad of reasons why a woman would want to not carry a baby to term you seem fine sentencing her to the 9 months of pain, the delivery, the medical bills, the permanent changes to her body, dealing with custody rights/battles, dealing with adoption hassles etc. etc. simply because she zigged when she shoulda zagged. The woman who was raped doesn't want to deliver, the woman who chose to have sex doesn't want to deliver. There is actually no real difference between to the two of them after conception, only the voluntarity of the sex and why should that matter so much? Neither wants to have a kid for one of a million possible reasons which are the mother's concern and none of ours.
The real kicker is is that there is NO way to force basically any of this on the father. You can throw him in jail for being a dead beat but that still doesn't help the mother, garnish his wages (if he really earns much), he didn't deal with the birth and cannot really be forced into any of the consequences of the sex. He can get off scott free while the woman is stuck with a permanent bill.
In the end people with your view are guilty of the most prolific misogynist violence forced on women. So punish women for having sex? Got it.
