Both of you are correct. I'll work on a list later on tonight or tomorrow morning.
Printable View
Both of you are correct. I'll work on a list later on tonight or tomorrow morning.
I hate to be the negative one here because it seems that Yoshi is just curious but it seems to me that: A) Yoshi just wants to be able to call more games as non- exclusives or B) There are no exclusive games with the exception of systems too powerful to be emulated by PCs because all of these VC/PSN/XBLA re-releases are just rom dumps.
A) I call spades spades.
B) I can tell you with certainty that the three systems nominated can all be emulated by PCs.
edit: Speaking only for myself, what it comes down to is that I don't want to ever go back to where I was circa 2000 with every system ever made hooked up and games everywhere. So in prioritizing what I need to own and have set up, this discussion very much matters. Since legality matters to me, the line needs to be drawn between VC/PSN and all of the PC emulators. I haven't even bought a Famicom cart or disc of anything available on VC without first buying the VC version to give the publisher their cut.
I'm not sure about the amount available on PSN, but PS1 seems to be an easy choice. NES as well. A list for the systems would be a fun project...for Yoshi.
I have lists for what I care about for several systems, including NES, SNES, PS1, and PS2, but that is certainly nowhere near the complete list for each system. I would love nothing more than to one day have a database that captures the only and/or best place to play every game ever made.
Given the rules, I'd have to agree with the PS2 for reasons already stated, even though I've barely played mine compared to most other systems.
If we ignored VC/PSN rom dumps, the PC engine would be a strong contender. Just about the whole library was exclusives.
peecee
Dreamcast. Because Seaman.
it's actually the ps2, hands down. even more so if we count the ps1 library along with it.