I have the original on Steam. Never played it. It's way down the list
Printable View
I have the original on Steam. Never played it. It's way down the list
You can beat it in like 4 hours at most. There's a "true" ending that takes a little while longer. The thing's fantastic. I'm hoping that this new version will be DLC for the original, as well as a standalone.
I am super down. Bought it for PS3/Vita and then PC. Love the game and will happily support it.
I think I read it has like 30% more content, so that is what, 2000 more terrible game references?
That's really the only bad thing about it. Easily ignored.
Go play Guacamelee, Joust. It's worth it.
They've already started off with one of the most tired video game subtitle parodies in existence, so yeah, probably.Quote:
Originally Posted by Diff-chan
Oh is this another Scott Pilgrim where people go apeshit over some lame stuff while ignoring the fact the gameplay is mediocre?
pft I'm out
It's better than Scott Pilgrim, for sure.
I think it's a pretty substandard Metroidvania-style game, though.
I've never played this game, but I'm willing to bet ten million dollars that there's an "another castle" "joke" in there.
Go ahead. Keep cutting funding for the arts. This is what we get when people who have never read a book try to create entertainment.
Well, there's at least one.