It should, if you're good. That sentence tells me you probably aren't. :(Quote:
Originally posted by IronPlant
It isn't my fault if you think that getting with a girl automaticly means screwing them.
Printable View
It should, if you're good. That sentence tells me you probably aren't. :(Quote:
Originally posted by IronPlant
It isn't my fault if you think that getting with a girl automaticly means screwing them.
you're a sad sad man if you can't date something with out doing so purely for the reason of fucking it.
Perhaps so, but at least I am a man.Quote:
Originally posted by IronPlant
you're a sad sad man if you can't date something with out doing so purely for the reason of fucking it.
at least
OK let's see.
First I'll state a line of what dirty magazines I do know about:
Playboy: Good standard, doesn't really do anything for me. In most countries it isn't "porn"; wonder why.
Hustler: Bring back scratch'n sniff! Surprisingly good looking women considering the content. Please update your back-section movie and print ads from 1983.
Swank: Generous amounts of pictures, funny how most of the chicks are the same 5 people but with different hair color/name each month (well, at least that's how it was a few years back). The jokes are funny but nobody is taking your porno reviews or horror stories seriously. And at least have the courtesy to have all -unique- phone ads.
Penthouse: PISSING IS NOT EROTIC. THANK YOU. Enjoy Chapter 13.
Gent: It's like lesbian Swank with bustier/fatter chicks (sometimes). I guess it's good for its intents, and nothing's wrong with a 48D/28 sometimes.
Oh and since Maxim got brought up: it's the best sitting-on-the-shitter magazine ever.
Leg Show and Perfect 10/or one of the many knockoffs. Thank you.
Humm... Maxim and the Maxim wannabes are ok at the end of the day - picture wise (but then you could just go to www.maximmag.com ). With little shame I say this: Victoria Secreat catalogs are far finer :) Leaves some to your imagination and most of the models are genuinely attractive. Like Maxim but less diluted and tastefull enough. Last I checked, Playboy is good and really doesn't come off as pr0n to me. I've not seen the others :/ The internet makes it free.
Anime characters? Meh... I don't like the style, but I'm not getting off on Danger Girl either. I think it has something to do with not being very realistic looking. Aesthetically it's fine (depending on what you're looking at) and at time better than some of your usually very ugly women staring in various porn movies... but that's simply because they (drawings) don't (usually I suppose) look like they have had 12 kids and herpes :gag:
ºTracer