Bowling for Columbine

[teenwolf]

Limbaugh and Michael Moore are nowhere near comparable. But hey, why not try to compare him to someone else in an effort to avoid responding to my comments and the issues that the urls brought up... And trying to say that Michael Moore isn't half as "dogmatic" as Limbaugh supposedly is? What an incredibly inane and baseless comment to make. Everything Michael Moore does is dogmatic and ideologically based. Almost everything Limbaugh talks about also has a set ideological basis, except he adheres to logic reason and is intellectually honest and doesn't hide behind satire as a way to defuse comments about the factual basis for his claims or comments.

[Almaci]

roflol, man youre delusional beyond belief.

[Dolemite]

Originally posted by seen
Here's a list of where it is playing around the country.

Sweet! It's playing right near me in Great Neck. I just might see it tonight...

[teenwolf]

Originally posted by Almaci
roflol, man youre delusional beyond belief.

Care to point out some of these hilarious delusions with facts? And you still haven't bothered to answer my previous points.

[Almaci]

Quote:Care to point out some of these hilarious delusions with facts? And you still haven't bothered to answer my previous points.


hehe I have, youre just to stupid to realise it.
When I said that he is just doing what people like Limbaugh do I admitted that he twists facts and uses halftruths to get his point across since that is what guys like Limbaugh do.

Want examples about Limbaugh and his ilk?
Ill give you a few from when i was over in the US during Clinton´s presidency(remember I live in belgium), he was acusing Clinton from everything ranging from theft to drugs to murder.
He didnt have a shred of evidence but that never stopped him making wild acusations against the guy 24/7.

[teenwolf]

Originally posted by Almaci
Quote:Care to point out some of these hilarious delusions with facts? And you still haven't bothered to answer my previous points.


hehe I have, youre just to stupid to realise it.
When I said that he is just doing what people like Limbaugh do I admitted that he twists facts and uses halftruths to get his point across since that is what guys like Limbaugh do.

Want examples about Limbaugh and his ilk?
Ill give you a few from when i was over in the US during Clinton´s presidency(remember I live in belgium), he was acusing Clinton from everything ranging from theft to drugs to murder.
He didnt have a shred of evidence but that never stopped him making wild acusations against the guy 24/7.

I am just too stupid to realize it? My points were that you failed to respond to my urls about michael moore, urls that pointedly illustrate his lack of factual evidence and his clear bias and use of rhetoric and propaganda. Your original answer to that was to try to compare him to Rush Limbaugh and say something to the effect that "everyone does it". First off your comparison is a red herring and two wrongs make a right, both logical fallacies.. Secondly your so called "example" of Limbaughs supposed similar behaviour to Michael Moore's is an accusation that "he was acusing Clinton from everything ranging from theft to drugs to murder.". This is a bold-faced lie. He never accused Clinton of theft, drugs or murder. He certainly brought up questions that were being raised about Vince Fosters death, and an accusation made by various sources in the press about alleged drug deals in Arkansas where allegedly political protection was given to people involved with the drug trade. We have laws in this country against libel and slander, and if he had accused them they would have had the legal recourse to sue him, there was no slander or libel on his part. Limbaugh does not twist facts, use half-truths or lie in an effort to strengthen his arguements or commentary. All your comments are nothing but broad generalizations, logical fallacies, virulent rhetoric and propaganda devoid of facts.

You have failed to respond to my comments on the issues raised about Michael Moore, his movie and body of works instead using logical fallacies in response. If you don't have anything intelligent to say on topic then go peddle your illogical non-factual leftist drivel elsewhere.

[Almaci]

Ah yes, does the term character assasination mean annything to you?

[teenwolf]

Originally posted by Almaci
Ah yes, does the term character assasination mean annything to you?

Does the term "Character Assassination" mean anything to me? Yes indeed it does. Does it have any relevance to Rush Limbaugh's actions or statements? No it doesn't. You failed to answer my last post in which I clearly stated your comments were _LIES_, he never accused Clinton of "everything ranging from theft to drugs to murder.". Did you come with any factual evidence to support your claim of Limbaugh assassinating Clintons character in reference to "everything ranging from theft to drugs to murder."? No you didn't. If you are now trying to refer to his many comments about Clintons other behaviour it is quite clear that Clinton needed no help in degrading his own character. His actions were felonious and he should have been imprisoned for them.

As I stated before, "All your comments are nothing but broad generalizations, logical fallacies, virulent rhetoric and propaganda devoid of facts.

You have failed to respond to my comments on the issues raised about Michael Moore, his movie and body of works instead using logical fallacies in response. If you don't have anything intelligent to say on topic then go peddle your illogical non-factual leftist drivel elsewhere.".

Maybe this time you might actually read that.

[Almaci]

Oh IC, so two years of baseles acusations, refering to the guy as guilty until proven innocent saying stuff like if they cant find annything to lock him up for good there has to be a big coverup and bla bla bla is OK?
Twisting timelines, making up silly theories etcetera etcetera, hey its al ok becouse twas Clinton, no need for proof when you can acuse people and say ALLEGEDLY.

Look at Bush, for over 6 months now, he has been saying he has irrefutable proof that Iraq has WMD, several times he said we will show that proof, if not public we will to oure closes alies, to this day no one has seen annything.
Yet by now the public believes him, tell a lie often enough, repeat the same line often enough and people will believe it without ever having seen proof, its a proven tactic.
Limbaugh does it, Bush sr did it, Bush Jr does it and to a far lesser extend does Moore do it.

[Almaci]

Sorry I have been slow in replying.
But unlike youre conservative ass this pinko leftist commie one actually has a life and has to do stuff for a living, I was of to Germany to help advance the proliferation of videogames.

In anny case here are a few of rush his lies.

Do a google search if ya want MOORE (har har de har har).


Rush Lies
1) Limbaugh: "Don't let the liberals deceive you into
believing that a decade of sustained growth without inflation
in America (in the '80s) resulted in a bigger gap between the
have and the have-nots. Figures compiled by the
Congressional Budget Office dispel that myth"
(Limbaugh, The Way Things Ought to Be, p. 70).
Reality: CBO numbers for after-tax incomes show that in
1980 the richest fifth of our country had eight times the
income of the poorest fifth. By 1989, the ratio was more
than 20-to-1.

2)Limbaugh: "The poorest people in America are better off
than the mainstream families of Europe" (radio, 1993).
Reality: The poorest 20 percent of Americans can purchase
an average of $5,433 worth of goods with their income.
Meanwhile, in Germany, the average person can purchase
$20,610 worth of goods; in France, $19,200;
in Britain, $16,730 (World Development Report 1994,
published by the World Bank).