Originally posted by mattvanstone
I actually got into a talk about this the other day with someone from the mag, the failing it seems, is that both of us would have done PSO for DC in 1-2 days, and given it a score of 80.
Knowing now, that after playing it for months solid, I would have given it a 95 at least, but, that's the double edged DB Saber (hah!) of time based work.
when you were at GF was any thought given to inclusing i dont know what you would call it but
something like Is it still good and say 3 - 4 months after a game comes out the review who reviewed it gives their quick opinon on if it still holds up or if its gotten better?


, but it's cool. Other things like giving no coverage to a shitty game at all, putting more reader input into the mag (beyond art and letters) and more features (like a page done by 1 editor a month) were all discussed.


Bookmarks