Pro-Life- it's too broad and doesn't do shit towards actually explaining the cause.
Alright, the two terms "Anti-War" and "Pro-Life" are both pretty fucking stupid, obviously.
No one likes war, and everybody likes life.
Which term do you think is more obviously foolish/non-descriptive?
Pro-Life- it's too broad and doesn't do shit towards actually explaining the cause.
matthewgood fan
lupin III fan
I say Anti-War because I am Pro-Life.
...and, yeah, it does sound kinda stupid, I'll admit.
Pro-Life. Anti-War of course speaks for itself, maybe not as much in peacetime, but definitely when there's the potential for a war going on. Pro-Life on the other hand is extremely vague and doesn't really express its position, and I'll leave my opinions on Pro-Life out of it from there.
--Retrovertigo
http://images.listen-to.com/png.php/1/ricknuzzy
Heh, well, this is silly, but I think the question would be more interesting if you voted without thinking about your own beliefs.
Just think about which term more obviously perverts the actual belief described in pursuit of a positive rhetorical effect, and vote for that one.
Pro-Life, because its a horrible, extreme radical, leftist, propaganda machine in and of itself. Its implication is that if you're not pro-life, you're pro-death... and who is pro-death? The other side has to make do with pro-choice, which is not nearly as insinuating or condescending to the other side ("Im pro-you-tell-me-what-to-do!" doesn't quite fly).
Im pro-war.
your mom
I agree. Pro-Life is too broad. Everyone is pro-life. I think it's how you define life that creates so much controversy. In terms of abortion, it's a really touchy subject. I'm not sure where I stand, but I do believe that women should have the choice of what to do. I don't know all the facts though.
SC
Pro-Life is just stupid...Some people actually like war.
Freedom is a road seldom travelled by the multitude...
Bookmarks