View Poll Results: Do you think that the DD series as a whole has aged well?

Voters
39. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    19 48.72%
  • No

    20 51.28%
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Thread: Has the Double Dragon series aged gracefully?

  1. Has the Double Dragon series aged gracefully?

    Topic.

  2. dd 1&2, yes
    3&that aweful fighting game,hell no.
    Quote Originally Posted by Compass
    Squall's a dick.

  3. Without a doubt:

    Return of Double Dragon SFC is still a top class beat em up and Double Dragon II PCE isn't too shaby either. Aside from the original and the above games though, the series went into the toilet fast. Can't wait for Double Dragon Advance

  4. Bah, 1 and 2 for the NES are fine.

    But 3, holy crap, it wasn't even good WHEN it came out.
    R.I.P Kao Megura (1979-2004)

  5. But 3, holy crap, it wasn't even good WHEN it came out.
    If it was crap then, and its crap now, then it seems to have aged fine.

  6. double dragon 2 for nes will forever remain the shit. It's aged just fine.
    I keep my heat close like robocop

  7. sure have. Double Dragon 1&2 (Arcade and NES), and Super Double Dragon are easily the best beat em ups of all time. they've aged just fine.

    i can't wait for Double Dragon Advance. it's been #1 on me most wanted list for GBA for well over a year now.

  8. The only cool thing about Double Dragon is my friends and I made a music video using footage from the game. I don't even remember what song it was, but I think I still have it on an old beta tape someplace.

    I always liked Final Fight better anyway.
    "I've watched while the maggots have defiled the earth. They have
    built their castles and had their wars. I cannot stand by idly any longer." - Otogi 2

  9. As people have said, Double Dragon I & II are quite good by the standards of their genre. It's a shame Technos let it go to hell after that, other than the decent SNES game.

    I think the first two DD games are much better than Final Fight. It's in large part because the stages seem much more interesting, particularly in DD II; There's a definite and satisfying progression, and some nice jumping bits to negotiate. In comparison, the FF stages only scroll to the right with little in the way of real obstacles, making them tedious as hell.

    I think DD has more technique to the fighting, too, particularly with the grab and back-turned moves.

  10. #10
    I've been playing the NES DD games quite a bit lately on my Axim, DD2 seems to be the most fun to me, part 1 is good for different reasons, although a tad frustrating since it's a bit harder. Back in the day I enjoyed part 3 once I got over the annoying difficulty (you only have ONE friggin life until later) but I played it some today and it was decent, but I'd rather be playing the other games.
    Quote Originally Posted by EvilMog View Post
    Screw being smart. This is TNL.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Games.com logo