Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: More new info on Spiderman 2, Van Helsing, etc

  1. Quote Originally Posted by Dragonmaster Dyne
    im sick of these vague ass marvel posters. "2 july 2004". just fucking write spiderman 2. they did the same shit with xmen 2. anyway i saw an interview with tobey and he said the stunts are a LOT more grueling than the first which should be good. who's the other baddie? i thought there were two this time?
    Supposedly The Lizard, though I haven't heard anything about him, so I think he may have been scrapped for just Doctor Octopus.
    Name: Rock
    Town: Arcadia

  2. I think they decided to focuse on 1 villian, and so the Lizzard wont be appearing.

  3. isnt venom or carnage supposed to be in the 3rd or 4th movies? i like when they focus on one villian because usually the extras dont get fleshed out.

    i still think jim carey with his dumb and dumber hair is the spitting image of doc oc tho.

  4. I really hope they would, but then again, PG13 rated film, wont do Carnage justice. He named Carnage for nothing.

    But Venom could work, and it would be very interesting to see how they will implement him.

  5. Quote Originally Posted by Captain Vegetable
    The Helsing Organization is named for Van Helsing. Integra is his blood relative.

    P.S. There's no "K" in Doc. Oc.
    Boy you sure like to correct people, but Spiderman does call him Doc Ock in the comics out of mockery.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonmaster Dyne
    im sick of these vague ass marvel posters. "2 july 2004". just fucking write spiderman 2. they did the same shit with xmen 2.
    That type of marvel movie format was only used in X2 and I think people would know its X-Men 2 with all the characters on the poster. They did change it though to X-Men 2: X-Men United or something but that was last minute and stupid.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonmaster Dyne
    i still think jim carey with his dumb and dumber hair is the spitting image of doc oc tho.
    No way dude I can't see him in that part but he was pretty perfect for the Riddler, plus he's skinny as hell. Doctor Octopus is more pudgy, I thought Sam Neill was perfect for the role especially after Event Horizon but Alfred Molina will work too since hes a good actor and looks the part still.

  6. The Doc looks Badass. I can't wait for Spiderman 2 and X-men 3. Are these trailers or something BTW? Are they up for DL somewhere? Hopefully DC will learn from Marvel and put out a good Batman or JLA movie.

  7. Quote Originally Posted by Dragonmaster Dyne
    im sick of these vague ass marvel posters. "2 july 2004". just fucking write spiderman 2. they did the same shit with xmen 2. anyway i saw an interview with tobey and he said the stunts are a LOT more grueling than the first which should be good. who's the other baddie? i thought there were two this time?
    Yeah, totally, I thought that was a poster for some movie I may not have heard of, like "2: The Story of the Guy With Metal Tubes Coming Out of His Back." Marvel really should be more fucking obvious.


    "I can only say that there is not a man living who wishes more sincerely than I do to see a plan adopted for the abolition of slavery." - Tommy Tallarico

  8. Quote Originally Posted by Dragonmaster Dyne
    im sick of these vague ass marvel posters. "2 july 2004". just fucking write spiderman 2. they did the same shit with xmen 2. anyway i saw an interview with tobey and he said the stunts are a LOT more grueling than the first which should be good. who's the other baddie? i thought there were two this time?
    wow dyne. such fire.

    heh. it's pretty obvious to anyone that knows about the spiderman franchise that it's doc ock, so there's little need to put Spiderman 2. straightforward? yes. intriguing though? hardly. besides, this is a "teaser" and well - you know how those go

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Games.com logo