
Originally Posted by
diffusionx
RE4 will also cost them good money to put on PS2. Honestly, putting RE on GameCube killed the franchise from a viability standpoint. Nintendo was betting that PSX fans would buy a GameCube to play the games. All PSX fans did was play something else. Would they have bought the new games anyway? Outbreak didin't do that good and it was the first online RE game.PSX fans would have found new things to play if RE was on thier console or not. Look at MGS. Top dog last gen, but the new version(maybe the best version) was overshadowed by GTA on the PS2
The series was, along with Final Fantasy and Tomb Raider, the top dog on PSX. Now its second-tier to GTA and Halo. Did putting it on systems like Dreamcast and GameCube cause this? Yes. Please this hapens every gen. Sonic and Mario were top dogs during 16 bit and now thier gone. RE and FF were popular last gen and now thier halo and GTA bitches. Qoute me on this a new ip wil come out next gen and overtake halo and GTA as the big games of the gen. It has nothing to do with porting franchises.
You cant quantify these things but Capcom wouldve sold a lot more copies of these games if they put them on the PS2 first. RE4 is by most people's estimation the best RE game yet and one of the best games ever and has moved 500,000 copies so far. That is pitiful, the PSX games sold 6 or 8 times that. Im sure, internally, Capcom has been fuming at this decision for years and wishes they could take it back.
It has sold close to million world-wide. It didn't bomb by any strecth of the imigination. Will RE4 have sold better on the PS2? Not by much. There are new ips out there that have taken the mainstream eye and without that a lot of people would have just passed by.
And PN03 is not worth owning or playing. No one will ever convince me that that piece of crap is worth anything more than the bottom of a garbage can.
Bookmarks