whatever.. it's not like either of you read the book..![]()
I hate you for your lack of taste.Originally Posted by AstroBlue
You sir, are a hideous hermaphroditical character which has neither the force and firmness of a man, nor the gentleness and sensibility of a woman.
whatever.. it's not like either of you read the book..![]()
I hate Vivendi Universal.
Barf! Barf! Barf!
Of course the book didn't "suck major ass", that was for shits and giggles. But I still think the movie did a lot of things way better than the book. For instance, how Tyler and "Jack" meet, it doesn't really set a presedence on their relationship in the book (it's just Chuck Palahniuk trying to be clever as always), but the meeting on the plane in the film version sets out what their whole relationship is going to be like. Also, I think the relationship between Marla and "Jack" is way more coherent in the movie, in the book it's clouded too much by that gay (literally and figuratively) homoerotic shit between Tyler and "Jack". Chuck Palahniuk is a great writer, but he's REALLY crap at writing realistic dysfunctional relationships between women and men. He's crap at writing women, period.
Survivor is a better book.
EDIT: The ending was the only thing better in the book.
Quick zephyrs blow, vexing daft Jim.
Yes, the meeting is done much better in the movie...and Survivor is a better book. I can agree with you there.
File this one under "Missing the fucking point".
Thankfully the game looks terrible enough on it's own.
This probably could sell alot if Brad Pitt agrees to be in it.
pwned by Ivan
oh yes, the book was much better than the moWANKERS
Originally Posted by Tracer
Bookmarks