
Originally Posted by
Master of 7s
It isn't simply a matter of semantics. Without turning this into a TNL Religious Bitch Fight™®, Marriage is (or is supposed to be) a holy institution supported, sanctioned, and blessed by God and His church. Civil unions are institutions supported and sanctioned by law and the government. And therin is the problem most people, including Bush have with gay marriage. That people are trying to use God's name as license for sin.
The difference is more than just in name alone. If the government wants to sponsor and support civil unions, by all means. I'm willing to bet that most people, including the religious right, would be all for it. Just keep God's name out of it and everybody is happy.
This further backs my desire to get rid of state sponsored marriage. Keep your God's name out of my government. You take your God's name out of this and I'll be quite happy, but as long as the state is sponsoring it then I don't see any religious arguement against Gay Marriage and yet for Civil Unions as valid.
Our Deistic fore fathers made it a point to keep religious references out of the constitution and I'd prefer to keep it that way.
You sir, are a hideous hermaphroditical character which has neither the force and firmness of a man, nor the gentleness and sensibility of a woman.
Bookmarks