Originally Posted by diffusionx
The Last Blade series owns your ass...
Seriously. Anyone who believes games like SvC: Chaos, KOF200x, and Samurai Showdown V are good fighters is on crack. Has to be. These are some of the worst 2D fighting games in the past decade.
SNK pushes out embarassing fighting games like I push out large stools. Its a feat, really.
Originally Posted by diffusionx
The Last Blade series owns your ass...
Originally Posted by Mzo
i will have a nuon someday for my tempest 3000...
Notice how all the games diff listed are recent, while Last Blade is not.Originally Posted by JMET
But I'm sure SNK could fuck up a Last Blade 3 if it tried, though.
R.I.P Kao Megura (1979-2004)
I don't like Nintendo for getting rid of progessive scan support (I still have to send my cube back to get a "refurbished" cube with teh digital video port), and for the lakc of online for the Cube. Other than that, I think they make some good games, and I don't mind when they rehash games because there are some games I missed, so I'll get them at the right price. If I don't want it, or I think it's too much money, I don't buy it, simple as that.
Check out my blog: ExHardcoreGamer.com
Nintendo owns no one will ever change that.
Originally Posted by Master Shake
when the specs and screenshots of the next gen come rolling out full steam im sure 8 out of 10 people here that said theyre uninterested will change their tune. kind of easy to be uninterested when we have next to no info on the matter.
did somebody just admit to having a rather loose asshole?Originally Posted by diffusionx
![]()
The real question is do we really need a new generation of systems right now? Now I'm sure I'm gonna get 2 out of the 3 or hell if I feel real saucy, all 3 of the next gen gaming consoles, but is it really a necesity? I think not. I mean how much can graphics really improve?
Heh. People have been saying that sort of thing since the beginning of videogames.Originally Posted by DarkCrow676
Did you see the pictures in the Elder Scrolls 4 thread? Doom 3 is just scratching the surface. Im predicting photorealism in the next generation of sports titles.
The thing that bothers me though is that they still sell fucking RF adapters with these new systems. Everytime I sell an Xbox or a PS2 RF adapter (oftentimes with the system), I cringe. I tell the people that buying a new TV set would really help them see what these new games are capable of, and s-video is a huge step up from RF, but they just dont care. Theyre gonna be buying Xbox2 and PS3 and hooking it up with RF. Its a real bottleneck.
Last edited by diffusionx; 12 Sep 2004 at 09:46 PM.
I'm not sure if I really want photorealism in my games. I guess in sports games it would be really awsome, but other then that, I just don't see how graphics can get much better. I'm sure they will continue to progress where every detail is perfect such as no jagged lines anywhere and perfect physics with everything and such, but the thing is is that is it really a must? Do we really need to switch to a new generation of systems when the graphics of games on the current systems are still vastly improving.Originally Posted by diffusionx
Bookmarks