What if the point of the game was to race through the city to get to KFC before anyone else?Originally Posted by Fighter-X
Call me picky, but if I looked at your (current) list and had to make a decision on which system to buy, I don't think a bunch of racers is going to sway me to get an X-Box.Originally Posted by Jeremy
It does have a few good exclusives (though not as good as Nin or Sony).
It might as well be. It's going to be here quicker than you'd think.Originally Posted by Rumpy
What if the point of the game was to race through the city to get to KFC before anyone else?Originally Posted by Fighter-X
Crazy Taxi 3's another great one!
matthewgood fan
lupin III fan
If the question was "name a sequel that isn't as good as the ones before it, plays worse, has a lower framerate, etc", then yes, you'd be right. Hey, the Xbox does have some good exclusives, but naming that one might not be a great idea.
I only mentioned it due to the KFC mention by diff, the game is worthless, beyond the redone CT 1 area with the jump.
matthewgood fan
lupin III fan
No, looking at the calander, it's a long way off no matter how you cut it. Time moves the same speed for everyone.Originally Posted by Fighter-X
I'll let this kid speak for me.Originally Posted by diffusionx
Thanks for proving my point.Originally Posted by Jeremy
"So are you gonna try to tell me that games like Halo or Grand Theft Auto 3 could've been done on the PlayStation? Are you insane?"
Are YOU insane? ;-p
Of course they could have been done on PS1. Obviously the graphics would have to be downgraded a bit but yeah they could be done. All you need is decent 3D hardware on ps1 - check ; doesnt have to be ultra powerful) and two you need (well maybe anyway) analog sticks on the controllers (on ps1 - check)![]()
The PS1 would probably have a heart attack handling the vehicle physics of Halo or GTA3 alone.Of course they could have been done on PS1.
Bookmarks