Page 9 of 25 FirstFirst ... 578910111323 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 241

Thread: Zelda 2005 New Pictures

  1. Quote Originally Posted by remnant
    SO GTA:SAN ANdreas isn't a sequel,Opaque? Wow I learn crap from you everyday.
    No one is playing their 5th GTA game idiot. Out of the 20 million people that are playing GTA:SA, 19.5 million of them are playing their 3rd GTA game.

    SIDENOTE: Super Mario Bros. 3 - Best in the series
    Legend of Zelda: LTTP - Best in the series.

  2. Quote Originally Posted by dave is ok
    Quote Originally Posted by remnant
    SO GTA:SAN ANdreas isn't a sequel,Opaque? Wow I learn crap from you everyday.
    No one is playing their 5th GTA game idiot. Out of the 20 million people that are playing GTA:SA, 19.5 million of them are playing their 3rd GTA game.
    2 Things

    1. Why is remnant addressing me when he knows I can't see him?

    2. GTA SA is a radical change from VC and III, but I wouldn't expect him to understand the difference between the evolution Rockstar is making with GTA and the lack of evlution Nintendo has made with the bulk of their series.

  3. I'm most impressed by the fact that those shots look undoctored. Unlike early shots from almost every other company (super high-res shots with photoshopping here and there).

  4. The first thing I thought when I saw the 2nd picture is "doctored". Looks way too perfectly staged, with the perfect hit effect flare and wahtever.

  5. Honest kids, who gives a damn? People who play GTA have their reasons, as do Zelda gamers. It's a hobby afterall, and I'm quite glad there's enough games out there to feed every niche out there.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diff-chan View Post
    Careful. We're talking about games here. Fun isn't part of it.

  6. It's too blurry and pixilated to be doctored though.

    Obviosuly they planned to get that shot, but they didn't alter the shot after they took it.
    Last edited by Opaque; 24 Nov 2004 at 05:50 PM.

  7. Quote Originally Posted by Sqoon
    Once the game forced you, it stopped being fun and became like homework. I (and some other friends) didn't finish WW because of that shitty way-too-long fetch quest.
    summed up my feelings exactly.

  8. one more pic. link looks great but that enemy looks fucking horrible. wtf!?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	the-legend-of-zelda-gcn-20041123071036072.jpg 
Views:	63 
Size:	47.3 KB 
ID:	12686  

  9. Quote Originally Posted by Opaque
    2 Things

    1. Why is remnant addressing me when he knows I can't see him?

    2. GTA SA is a radical change from VC and III, but I wouldn't expect him to understand the difference between the evolution Rockstar is making with GTA and the lack of evlution Nintendo has made with the bulk of their series.

    GTA SA would actually be way better if the game was the same as 3 and VC with improvements where it really counts. I mean, if you had this huge gaping wound you wouldnt leave it there and bleed as long as you have a new jacket/haircut/necklace to cover up your wound. Just adding things to an inherently flawed game isnt very good evolution. It sounds like the series is going to be dissed faster than Mortal Kombat and Tekken when people realize the game sucks. I'm surprised it has outlasted Toshinden actually.

    Anyways, the new Zelda looks great to me judging from the trailer. The animation and design look pretty solid. The pics remind me of Kingdom Under Fire and that game looks amazing.

    ps. Katamari Damacy is innovative, but you can tell what games influenced the developers. Nights with its magnetized section where you gather as much crap on you as you can and drag it through the slot machine thingy. Im thinking a lot of Sonic Team influences, shit to do with rolling physics like Billy Hatcher. Or any game that utilizes magnets or rolling snowballs until they are big.

    Still, Im not saying that Namco copied any of those games. The game is definitely unique and different. I just thought people might like to know some possible influences.

    ICO isnt new though. Its lost vikings mixed with POP. You can even say any game with a side kick that follows you can get in your way just as much as the chick from ICO.

  10. Diffusion X's criticisms regarding Nintendo are rehashes and carbon copy sequels of numerous past criticisms. So in a way, his argument has shown the stupidity of what Nintendo does out of survival, by mirroring it. If something gets a certain reaction (Nintendo games and Diffusion X arguments), by repeating them over and over you will achieve the same reaction in the short-term; but in the long-term, people will realise what a worthless piece of shit you are.

    I think Diffusion X was doing this slyly to prove a point, and I for one applaud him.
    Quick zephyrs blow, vexing daft Jim.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Games.com logo