I like that thing where you pitch the ball through a bunch of walls.
Originally Posted by Ammadeau
Try again MechDeus.
I don't need to. First off, look at your sentence with the double negative removed: "It's a Nintendo game if it's innovative and a Namco game if it is." Interesting wording.Originally Posted by SpoDaddy
Now then, what they were saying is that if Nintendo so desperately wants everyone to innovate they need to create innovative products. Instead, they're focusing on cash cows and injecting Mario into way too many products. Almost everyone was talking about Nintendo being not innovative in general, not specifically on Mario Baseball like your misguided interpretation said. And Ammadeau had to remind you twice about that Namco bit. Yes, you. Might I also remind you that you were just as guilty as Opaque of claiming Nintendo's creation of this game after it was pointed out it was by Namco (even though he was just pointing out the flaws in your argument and who the developer is was a superfluous point)? If you want to claim he was contridicted by that then you were too. Kinda funny coming from a "Voice of Reason."
In short, they said Nintendo wasn't innovating and Ammadeau pointed out to you that Mario Baseball was being made by Namco. Both of those statements are true at the exact same time. Amazing.
Finally, on top of all that, if we take a look at your condensation of the argument:Releasing and developing aren't the same thing and both can happen at the same time by each of those companies. Nintendo can, in fact, release a game made by Namco.How dare Nintendo say there's a lack of innovation in gaming and then release a baseball game? Period!
If it's innovative, Namco developed it so Nintendo doesn't get credit for innovating anyway
Feel free to pick whichever way you prefer to lose.
You do realize you are making a logical arguing against someone who has recently made the statements:
"The 16 bit era was fought out by two game companies and it ended up being the greatest period in gaming history..
I think we can all agree that Nintendo's a whole lot more important to this generation than any of us thought they'd be back when 360 looked awesome, the DS sucked, PSP had a chance to be a contender, and PS3 could process polygons faster than God. Now everyone's playing Nintendogs or Advance Wars DS or Meteos or Kirby CC (and if they aren't they should be) and waiting for hope from Revolution or some miracle PS3 announcement."
Quit trolling my fucking thread.Originally Posted by kbuchanan
There is a team for each "main" character: Mario, Yoshi, Wario, DK, Peach, and Bowser. However, the way the challenge mode works is that you pick a captain. You go from stadium to stadium playing the other teams and completing "missions" during the game that makes players on the other teams join you. That's is typically 3-4 players. The rest of the team is made up on "clones", such as Shy Guys, skeleton turtles, or Koopas. They are different for each team. There are roughly 30 playable characters.Originally Posted by StriderKyo
When I got to Bowser's team yesterday, my starting nine was made up of Yoshi, Mario, Luigi, Wario, DK, King Boo, Koopa, a winged Goomba, and a Piranha Plant. Players have different stats in Fielding, Pitching, Hitting, and Running, so you put players in positions where they are the best fit. Yoshi is the fastest, for instance.
Last edited by Yoshi; 31 Aug 2005 at 10:41 AM.
I know this game is getting a lot of heat from this thread, but that sounds awesome. I need to give this a go soon,Originally Posted by Yoshi
Lick my balls.Originally Posted by dog$
What's the subtitle to your thread, hypocrite?
Last edited by Kbu Chan; 31 Aug 2005 at 12:35 PM.
PSN = knarlockk
Steam= kevinb150
Uh, I forget.
Is it "kbuchanan wants his balls licked by other men"?
why is there so much fighting and bsing going on over a fucking baseball game
seriously maybe if this was the latest mario platformer I could see people getting heated or something but a fucking baseball game who gives a fuck
Bookmarks