Eh, at least it was a girl-finger. I'd be slightly more disgusted if it were a guy's.Health officials said the fingertip was approximately 1 1/2 inches long. They believe it belongs to a woman because of the long, manicured nail.
Eh, at least it was a girl-finger. I'd be slightly more disgusted if it were a guy's.Health officials said the fingertip was approximately 1 1/2 inches long. They believe it belongs to a woman because of the long, manicured nail.
I wonder if she was hot....
"Chuy, you're going to have a magical life. Because no matter where you go, it's always going to be better than Tucson."
Did they have to fingerprint the employees to see if any of their fingers matched? Couldn't they have just - oh, I don't know - seen if any employees had any fingers missing?
Also, I wouldn't be surprised if that lady put that finger there herself. I'm sure she got a nice sum of money out of the deal.
Your misfortune is proof enough for me.Originally Posted by Chux
Well that's like, your opinion, man.
2 very good points.Originally Posted by Swift
Dont restaurants have clauses against getting sued for stuff like this though.Of course no one signs any waivers before they eat (unless you order the 10 alarm hot sauce or poisonous raw Japanese blowfish),but what would prevent any ole' "Joe" from ordering some food, tossing in a rusty nail,toe,or condom into his food,blaming the restaurant,and raking in a pay-off check on the side?
no, because checking for missing fingers would've just been way too easy and obvious. they never mentioned if anyone was fingerprinted, and i don't think fingerprinting would've worked if that digit was stewing in the pot for so long.Originally Posted by Swift
Well obviously it does, because they did.Originally Posted by Ashen Victor
Why would they willingly give up their fingers?Originally Posted by Ashen Victor
I thought it was just a case of a lot of Weenie Tot employees losing their fingers rather than all Weenie Tots being made from them.
Bookmarks