Project Gotham 3

[Brand X]

no way in hell thats a game shot. you want shots, look at the link i posted in the 360 thread. looks like a photo with a very faint blur in PS to me. i mean why are there artifacts in the red sign? a rendered image wouldnt have that.

I don't doubt for a second you are going to eat your words.

Also considering this level of detail is on par with the shots that were previously released, I'm not surprised at all.

Here is another response to the thread epmode posted, from another person on the development team:

Yup - I'm going to back this one up as well.

That is 100% an in-game shot. This is PGR3, and this is the bar we're setting.

Chris

edit: And Dyne, if you would even have bothered to investigate that link you posted in the 360 thread, you would realize that those were vid caps taken from the E3 demo, which is the reason those pictures don't look nearly as good as the one that is posted above.

[Giga Power]

Hmmmm.

I know that the guys over at Bizarre are backing this up...but it just looks too good to be true, ya know?

Interesting to say the least. That's the most realistic looking 'screenshot' I've ever seen (if it really is one) and this makes PGR3 even more of a sure purchase when I pick up my 360.

I mean seriously guys...holy fucking shit.

[sethsez]

This is definitely a case of "waiting for footage before I believe anything."

[Brand X]

We all know though that when we're playing the game, that level of detail on the buildings will not really matter considering we're going to be driving by them at 150mph.

[StriderKyo]

Sadly, the official trailer looks nothing like those shots. It looks like...a slightly nicer PGR2.

I really want a reason to buy a 360 at launch, but almost nothing I've seen for it looks better than Chronicles of Riddick on the first Xbox.

[Opaque]

no way in hell thats a game shot. you want shots, look at the link i posted in the 360 thread. looks like a photo with a very faint blur in PS to me. i mean why are there artifacts in the red sign? a rendered image wouldnt have that.

I watched someone play the new Need for Speed at E3 and the tracks looked about on par with that.

You want me to believe that NFS can do it but PGR can't? I'm sorry, but that's not going to happen.

[epmode]

i mean why are there artifacts in the red sign? a rendered image wouldnt have that.

It's a JPEG, for god's sake.

edit: Wait a second, are you suggesting that this is actually a photograph? Look at this then:

[Tain]

It's a JPEG, for god's sake.

From a digital camera.

[Dyne]

I don't doubt for a second you are going to eat your words.


edit: And Dyne, if you would even have bothered to investigate that link you posted in the 360 thread, you would realize that those were vid caps taken from the E3 demo, which is the reason those pictures don't look nearly as good as the one that is posted above.

when i see it look like that when the game ships, fine. i like how you all sit here high and holy and you guys dont even know the truth either.

and vid cap or not, the screens i linked too look a HELLUVA lot different than the pic here and theyve only had a month to improve the game. c'mon now.

This is definitely a case of "waiting for footage before I believe anything."

thank you.

Sadly, the official trailer looks nothing like those shots. It looks like...a slightly nicer PGR2.

i agree. but why dont people gang reply to you two? (you and sethsez) odd.

[Tain]

Actually... I'm starting to almost believe this.

1) It's on Bizarre's webspace,
2) Bizarre teammembers say it's real
and
3) Look at the tiles behind 'eat inn'. You can see plenty of too-flat surfaces and polygonal edges if you look closely.