which leads to less time actually devoted to programming, which leads me to hitting the fast forward button more, which....Originally Posted by piku
DO you seriously think those people are watching PBS?Originally Posted by James
PBS should be supported by the state government and not the federal. If you want it then pay for it with your taxes or something. It makes no sense that the federal gov. has something a huge minority watch.
which leads to less time actually devoted to programming, which leads me to hitting the fast forward button more, which....Originally Posted by piku
Check out my blog: ExHardcoreGamer.com
It'd be a shame to see some channels like PBS have to cut back or be shut down but I honestly don't think the government should be giving any money to any television or radio station.
The strong laws restricting broadcasting were lost because cable made them irrelevant and unfair. What is the point of regulating broadcast news so heavily when people could just switch to CNN? And further, how is it fair to broadcast stations that they have to follow rules their competitors don't?Originally Posted by g0zen
Actually the vast majority of PBS funding does come from the state and not the federal government. My notes are buried in a box out in my garage so I can't get them right now but it is pretty lopsided.Originally Posted by avatar
There ain't no such thing as a free lunch. It is unfortunate that selling advertising in breaks located between programming is the only way for stations to make money but thats just how it is. I don't think the federal government has any driving reason to support a station just so it could be the only one that doesn't have commercials.Originally Posted by TobalRox
oh in that case I'm okay with PBS staying on the air. As long as it's not sucking federal cash.Originally Posted by piku
Off-Topic: Is Barney still on?
Some of them are, and that'll have to do.DO you seriously think those people are watching PBS?
Originally Posted by avatar
JamesOriginally Posted by James
Bookmarks