
Originally Posted by
arjue
Ok, MVS says that its a shit movie, then gives it a score of 7/10. He also said that Eternal Sunshine was a shit movie (i think he may have even called it typical or cliche, though i may be wrong). His views on any movie shouldn't warrant this much attention.
I don't care about the original source as it has absolutely nothing to do with how good a movie is. It can change your perception of it, as the movie could be significantly worse than the original source, but it still shouldn't be taken into account when objectively judging a movie. For example, To Kill a Mockingbird is held as one of the better movies of all time despite the book shitting all over it.
I fucking loved this movie. I don't think there has been a dark action/drama this good in a very long time. The visuals were fucking amazing at times, and the story was great. I loved the dialogue in the scene where V kills the old woman in her bed (not the whole "I KILLED YOU 10 MINUTES AGO" shit, i thought that was a little lame, the rest of that conversation was great). The slow motion fight didn't bother me at all, much better than shakey quick cut fight scenes. The copious amounts of blood looked really great too.
As for the down points, i felt that the film was a little slow (particularly when you have a full bladder for the last quarter), but it was kinda needed so it didn't really bother me much, and I just don't think Natalie Portman really sells herself as her character. Her crying when she was getting her head shaved looked really suss. I think she's a good enough actress but she's not suited to such an emotionally extreme role, its just not compatible with her more subtle acting style.
Bookmarks