Page 21 of 40 FirstFirst ... 71719202122232535 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 210 of 392

Thread: Super Princess Peach

  1. #201
    I still don't understand the decision to make a Peach game. Is this another part of the damned getting non-gamers to buy a DS strategy that spawned Nintendogs? If so, Nintendo can fuck off. This should have been a Yoshi game or a Mario game. Nintendo doesn't have the bandwidth to produce enough first party games to piss away energy on Peach. I hope this thing sells like shit. 2006 is the year Nintendo finally gets its ass kicked in the portable market, and with decisions like this one, they earned it.

  2. I'm not surprised by that IGN review, but, from the other impressions I read on the game, I don't think it should be taken too seriously. It annoys me how IGN assumes the game is aimed mostly at young girls just becuase the game is easy and stars a female character.
    Last edited by Brianvgplayer; 25 Feb 2006 at 04:28 PM.

  3. #203
    Quote Originally Posted by Yoshi
    I still don't understand the decision to make a Peach game. Is this another part of the damned getting non-gamers to buy a DS strategy that spawned Nintendogs? If so, Nintendo can fuck off. This should have been a Yoshi game or a Mario game. Nintendo doesn't have the bandwidth to produce enough first party games to piss away energy on Peach. I hope this thing sells like shit. 2006 is the year Nintendo finally gets its ass kicked in the portable market, and with decisions like this one, they earned it.
    We're getting a new 2d Mario this year and we had an excellent DK platformer last year. I'm sure we haven't seen the last of Yoshi platformers either. I would prefer Nintendo came up with a completely original new franchise but if they're sticking with the Mario universe I don't see what's the problem with using Peach as the main character for once. I wouldn't dismiss a great game based on the look of the sprite you control.

  4. Quote Originally Posted by NeoZeedeater
    We're getting a new 2d Mario this year and we had an excellent DK platformer last year. I'm sure we haven't seen the last of Yoshi platformers either. I would prefer Nintendo came up with a completely original new franchise but if they're sticking with the Mario universe I don't see what's the problem with using Peach as the main character for once. I wouldn't dismiss a great game based on the look of the sprite you control.
    Except this isnt a great game.

  5. I was at one time considering buying this (well, ordering online so I wouldn't be seen buying this in public) but maybe I'll just get Drill Dozer instead.

  6. #206
    Quote Originally Posted by diffusionx
    Except this isnt a great game.
    Yes, I'm sure you have actually played it.

  7. Quote Originally Posted by NeoZeedeater
    Yes, I'm sure you have actually played it.
    No, Im not going to and I dont need to. The shitty scores and reviews this game are getting tells all - yes they say its "good fun but easy" but thats with the Mario handicap. If it had Dora the Explorer or something instead of Peach it would be getting 5s and 6s. It might be a decent game but its certainly not great. It is, like all of Nintendo's games nowadays, substandard + fanservice.
    Last edited by diffusionx; 25 Feb 2006 at 04:49 PM.

  8. Quote Originally Posted by Yoshi
    I still don't understand the decision to make a Peach game. Is this another part of the damned getting non-gamers to buy a DS strategy that spawned Nintendogs? If so, Nintendo can fuck off.
    They made a Peach game to target the demographic that bought the "non-game" Nintendogs, and get them to purchase standard gaming. Is it meant for you? Probably not, but it still is a standard platformer.

    This should have been a Yoshi game or a Mario game.
    There is a new Mario game coming. Just wait for that.

    Nintendo doesn't have the bandwidth to produce enough first party games to piss away energy on Peach.
    Sure they do. They are a fairly big company that can produce many games.

    I hope this thing sells like shit.
    Good. Then don't fucking complain when all that is released is what you refer to as "non-games." I'd actually like to see a decent mix of games and "non-games." The more variety, the better.

    2006 is the year Nintendo finally gets its ass kicked in the portable market, and with decisions like this one, they earned it.


    Yeah, right. How the fuck are they going to get their ass kicked? Have you seen the DSLite, New Super Mario Bros., Metroid Prime Hunters, Tetris DS, Brain Training, and most likely Zelda: DS and Pokemon DS? Nintendo is going to dominate the handheld wars this year. Better get used to your new dual-Screen, touch-screen overlords...

  9. #209
    Quote Originally Posted by Spike
    There is a new Mario game coming. Just wait for that.
    Yeah, except that it isn't hand-drawn like this.

    Sure they do. They are a fairly big company that can produce many games.
    Which explains why they handed Star Fox to Rare and then Namco, F-Zero to Sega, and Mario Baseball to Namco, right?

    Good. Then don't fucking complain when all that is released is what you refer to as "non-games." I'd actually like to see a decent mix of games and "non-games." The more variety, the better.
    I hope companies that release non-games go bankrupt over it.

    Yeah, right. How the fuck are they going to get their ass kicked? Have you seen the DSLite, New Super Mario Bros., Metroid Prime Hunters, Tetris DS, Brain Training, and most likely Zelda: DS and Pokemon DS? Nintendo is going to dominate the handheld wars this year. Better get used to your new dual-Screen, touch-screen overlords...
    Easy. The DS was able to get a bunch of quality games out the door in late 2005 for two reasons: 1. The hardware is a little bit older than the PSP. 2. The hardware is less powerful and easier to develop for than the PSP. What was a boon for the DS in late 2005 will be a boon for the PSP in 2006. Go look at the announced games for each for this year. The PSP stomps all over it. Could that change at E3? Sure, but I predict it will get more lopsided. The fact that all you could name were first party games is evidence of it.

    I will never understand the anti-Sony sentiment on this board. They have had better games than all competitors combined for two generations. While you're rubbing your cock against your Xbox and DS in the backseat, don't forget who's in the drivers seat.
    Last edited by Yoshi; 25 Feb 2006 at 05:01 PM.

  10. Quote Originally Posted by diffusionx
    No, Im not going to and I dont need to. The shitty scores and reviews this game are getting tells all - yes they say its "good fun but easy" but thats with the Mario handicap. If it had Dora the Explorer or something instead of Peach it would be getting 5s and 6s. It might be a decent game but its certainly not great. It is, like all of Nintendo's games nowadays, substandard + fanservice.
    I bet if it had Dora in it they would be saying its the best licensed platformer you can get on GameBoy. Because Dora is going to get compared to other Nickelodeon/Cartoon based games, and this is surely 10 times better than any other licencend product on the DS. Nintendo games get compared to Nintendo games.
    Barf! Barf! Barf!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Games.com logo