Fixed your "upon."
But otherwise, yes.
Last edited by mollipen; 09 Apr 2006 at 06:54 AM.
Fixed your "upon."
But otherwise, yes.
WARNING: This post may contain violent and disturbing images.
Well that sucks.
If this were ever allowed, then yeah it would blow.
I call bullshit. Bush is a moron, but surely he's not THAT big of a moron.
Time for a change
I'm pretty sure we've (the United States) already been using these nuclear Bunker Buster bombs/ missles.
The nuclear material is super dense depleted uranium. In this instance there isn't a nuclear reaction/explosion - but still radioactive material is spread in the air and can have repercussions for generation to come.
If you can't reach their nuclear facilities with conventional bunker busters, what the fuck is the other option? The bombs being discussed aren't like the ones that fixed Japan. They are tactical and explode underground.
Love that euphemism.Originally Posted by Yoshi
Great!
The farther down a nuke detonates the larger the area it irradiates. The ground water especially becomes toxic, and of course the explosion itself causes the irradiated dirt to be upthrown and then scattered in the downwind. This will scorch the Earth; cause cancer and birth defects for generations in anyone within a wide area of the explosion zones. We've seen this before in Iraq, and that was just from the chemical waste of DU rounds in the soil.
Time for a change
Bookmarks