Do you honestly remember teams that make the playoffs and then do nothing? The only one that comes to mind lately is the Colts.
Thank you for making my point. No stadium = team moves. Like they'd win a Super Bowl the minute they get to SC? A new stadium has nothing to do with them not winning any championships lately.They aren't moving cause they think the city is making them suck (does that even make sense?). They're moving cause the city voted against getting them a new stadium (the Stick is a piece of shit) and John York is a cheap asshole who won't spring for a new one on his own.
The only way to be a good team is to win the Superbowl? Fine, by that metric the Niners have sucked for the last decade just like 26 other teams.
They need a new stadium cause Candlestick sucks, not because it will make them win more.Thank you for making my point. No stadium = team moves. Like they'd win a Super Bowl the minute they get to SC? A new stadium has nothing to do with them not winning any championships lately.
The Giants and Jets play in New Jersey. It doesn't matter.
Last edited by Saint of Killers; 12 Nov 2006 at 07:11 PM.
I'd rather have Hasselbeck, Brees, Manning, Palmer, and probably a couple others who can actually win games instead of not losing them. If any of those guys had the Pats' defense over the last 5 years, they do at least as well.
The Cowboys can beat the Bears. I'm a lot more worried about getting payback for the implosion against the Giants and actually reaching the Bears. However, the fact that Romo has 1 INT in three starts now gives me confidence.
Bookmarks