Shrek 3

[James]

Shrek 3 would be a decent episode of a tv series. One of those episodes where not much happens but it's still necessary to get to the next plot point. As a movie, though, it was a waste of time.

James

[Cowutopia]

I found the first Shrek film to be a mildly amusing surprise, and then the second movie was borderline awful. The premise behind this series is played out now, and we surely don't need a third film.

[Shin Johnpv]

I'll probably see it just because it's 3D and animated, but I'm not expecting much out of it. I need Ratatouille to be released already damn it. Also can't wait for Horton next year.

[jonas]

Ratatouille is going to be fantastic. I can't wait. (well, because I'm a cook )

Anyways, I found Shrek 2 funny and I just hope that with Shrek 3 they go all out on the movie references again. Shrek 2 had so many, I'm hoping the third one will have just as many.

[Dolemite]

Nothing ages faster than comedies that rely solely on non-stop pop culture references.

[Shin Johnpv]

Nothing ages faster than comedies that rely solely on non-stop pop culture references.

Truth and that was my problem with Shrek 2 and to a much smaller extent Shrek. Both relied on pop culture references, shrek 1 only a little bit, shrek 2 an ASSLOAD. I really hope they didn't do that with Shrek 3.

[FX]

This film had absolutely no energy and nothing that made me want to keep watching, aside from a few good lines.

Everything felt "Ye Olde", and everything that ran on those very same jokes were "Ye Olde"

[Advocate]

It was funny in spots, But FX is right. It had no energy. None.

[Pineapple]

Piss on this series.

goddamn right.

[Space Pirate Roberts]

The first one was great because it was basically an hour and a half of jokes at Disney's expense. The irony is it's now become the very thing it was created to skewer.