Reply With QuotePart of me wouldn't mind seeing it, but the logic part of my brain screams NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
God I hope it never happens.
B Student
Part of me wouldn't mind seeing it, but the logic part of my brain screams NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Can you dig it?
Considering how bad GB2 was, I wouldn't mind if 3 languished in development hell for another few thousand years. There's no way it can be good.
Dolemite, the Bad-Ass King of all Pimps and Hustlers
Gymkata: I mean look at da lil playah woblin his way into our hearts in the sig awwwwwww
The Human
GB2 was not bad!
Originally Posted by Josh
Can you dig it?
Yes it was.
Although I always get a laugh out of the scene where Peter is doing the "photo shoot" with the painting of...um, whatever the bad guy's name was. "Okay, destroy me! Destroy me!"
Dolemite, the Bad-Ass King of all Pimps and Hustlers
Gymkata: I mean look at da lil playah woblin his way into our hearts in the sig awwwwwww
B Student
Ghostbusters 2 isn't as horrible as Murray makes it out to be, though I can see why he doesn't like it. It's undeniably flawed in terms of writing mostly. Vigo's lore is weak (save for that segment outside of the library describing how many ways he was killed), and there's a lot of repetition from the first movie, namely in how Peter and Dana woo eachother... again. They shouldn't have killed Egon and Jenine's weird romance. But there are enough strong moments throughout it to make it worth existing.
My brother has often raised a funny point about GB2. Why does the logo hold out two fingers? It makes sense on posters, because it's a sequel. But using it in the context of the movie is strange, they don't know it's a sequel, why would they change their logo?
I'd love a real Ghostbusters three movie.
But we all know that is not going to happen. IF they make another GB, it will be a passing of the torch movie so the studio can use new actors to pump out either A. more movies with the cheaper younger actors or B. make a shitty live action show.
"oh, ironbuttplant, you are being a silly negative dick"
Go back and listen to Dan Aykroyd in intervews from when the game came out. There is a LOT of talk about new ghostbusters and a girl ghostbusters and "franchising" in the ghostbusters world.
Mark my words, if Ghostbusters 3 sees the light of day, it is going to be just another excuse for Hollywood to defecate all over your childhood. Its going to be Transformers 2, except Optmus prime handed things off to bubble Bee. Sarah Silverman and Larry the Cable guy will be running around new york giggling about how Slimer looks like Kike Poo.
Can you dig it?
Yup. Weak, weak, weak. Although you're right, the line about how Vigo was killed was good, too.
I can't describe how totally lame the whole walking Statue of Liberty thing with "Higher and Higher" playing and people cheering and happy was. Ugh.
Yeah, that always annoyed me. Instead she bangs the vitamin nerd.They shouldn't have killed Egon and Jenine's weird romance.
Because the GB were shut down, and this was their SECOND CHANCE. omg!My brother has often raised a funny point about GB2. Why does the logo hold out two fingers? It makes sense on posters, because it's a sequel. But using it in the context of the movie is strange, they don't know it's a sequel, why would they change their logo?
Dolemite, the Bad-Ass King of all Pimps and Hustlers
Gymkata: I mean look at da lil playah woblin his way into our hearts in the sig awwwwwww
B Student
Do you honestly think that Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis could carry a movie now? I don't.
carry it as in "make an enjoyable movie for me to watch" or "get people into the theater so hollywood makes lots of money."
I know the first one is possible, I'm not so sure about the second one. Kids these days are pretty oblivious to anything not made in the past 10 years.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks