Man converts to Judaism, wants to force circumcision on unwilling 12yo son

[burgundy]

That's the dumbest thing you've ever said. I'm all for getting rid of the anteater because it's more clean when cut, less likely to contract an STD, and more attractive to women. Hetero guys get HIV all the time though; it's harder for a hetero guy to get it than a homo guy but it still can happen.

Yes. People die in car accidents all the time, but I bet you still drive.

[George]

Yes. People die in car accidents all the time, but I bet you still drive.

Sure, but if you had the option to wrap your car in a protective bubble that would protect you from almost all forms of bodily harm at the expense of your car's appearance, wouldn't you?

[burgundy]

Sure, but if you had the option to wrap your car in a protective bubble that would protect you from almost all forms of bodily harm at the expense of your car's appearance, wouldn't you?

You could just stay home.

There's way more of a difference between fucking without and with a condom then there is between drinking nondiet and diet soda.

[SpoDaddy]

Yes. People die in car accidents all the time, but I bet you still drive.

Yes, I drive with my seatbelt on in a car with 6 airbags and I never drink and drive. Just like I have sex in a monogamous relationship with a clean girl.

[burgundy]

People die in car accidents with seatbelts on and airbags around all the time.

And let's face facts, your girl is cheating on you.

[George]

You could just stay home.

There's way more of a difference between fucking without and with a condom then there is between drinking nondiet and diet soda.

You're sort of illustrating my point, and there's no need to get personal. What I'm getting at is you're comparing an act or situation where you have control over your chances of doing harm to yourself to something where you don't have as much control over, i.e. driving. There are odds when doing anything that you might be harmed or killed, but it doesn't mean there's no reason to take measures that would protect you from those low odds anyway, especially when it's of little cost to you.

[icarusfall]

If you refuse to bag it, you deserve the bad things that happen to you.

[SpoDaddy]

People die in car accidents with seatbelts on and airbags around all the time.

I can't live a productive life without driving a car, but I can live a productive life without having raw sex with skeezers. I'm happier in monogamous relationships so it's not really an issue for me.

And let's face facts, your girl is cheating on you.

All girls don't cheat, just like all Mets fans aren't gay.

[burgundy]

You're sort of illustrating my point, and there's no need to get personal. What I'm getting at is you're comparing an act or situation where you have control over your chances of doing harm to yourself to something where you don't have as much control over, i.e. driving. There are odds when doing anything that you might be harmed or killed, but it doesn't mean there's no reason to take measures that would protect you from those low odds anyway, especially when it's of little cost to you.

Right, which is why (generally) if I can't go raw I won't go at all.

But this is because of herpes, warts and children (the first two of which SURPRISE condoms don't protected effectively against), not the ridiculously small chance of HIV.

[MechDeus]

In 2005 there were 146 million males in the U.S., out of which there were 32k cases of new HIV infection. Just putting that out there.

Sure, but if you had the option to wrap your car in a protective bubble that would protect you from almost all forms of bodily harm at the expense of your car's appearance, wouldn't you?

They already did and stylized it, it's called airbags and crumpling framework.