Reply With Quote
Live for Windows doesn't mean a game can't also have support for another means of playing online. A game can have both. So then the question becomes "who would bother to pay."Originally Posted by Yoshi
The correct response is why would Valve let a feature that requires payment to someone other than them on their more popular platform?
Live for Windows doesn't mean a game can't also have support for another means of playing online. A game can have both. So then the question becomes "who would bother to pay."
I understand that both are supported. I'd still be hesitant to allow a game with features that someone else was making my customer pay for on my service. Uninformed customers could become pissed at me.
The only purpose of GfW Live is to allow people who already have 360s to play with their friends regardless of platform. For that it's good, otherwise it sucks.
I am part of this demographic. That means if I were to buy Shadowrun, it'd only cost me $37 instead of $60.
Yeah. It's fine for that. The PC port of Shadowrun has more control options, supports dedicated servers, and can run smoother, so it's the better way to go, but if you don't have Live already, fuck it.
Or you could wait 'till Sunday and get the PC version of Shadowrun for free at Circuit City when you buy the PC version of Halo 2 for $39.99.
Yeah...
I already got Halo.
Sausage
b_ri on Twitch, Games Beaten in 2020 (3): Pokemon Sword (Sw), Detroit: Becoming Human (PS4), Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice (PS4),
I'm Tommy Tallarico
Why are you linking us to shit you found on GAF that we talked about almost two months ago?
"I can only say that there is not a man living who wishes more sincerely than I do to see a plan adopted for the abolition of slavery." - Tommy Tallarico
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks