Ewww, very shitty. Will the gimps who buy this be graced with the lame ass grain and filters the Xbox version had to use to get the games graphics to look moderately decent?
Originally posted by MechDeus
See, there's a difference. The Crazy Taxi porting wasn't phenominal, but it wasn't horrible, either, it was quite playable with no major hit to any of it. This, however, is a major drop in graphics, the likes of which I haven't seen since adjusting graphics mode on PC games from the highest to the lowest. Eww...
Maybe if we hadn't had the XBox version, we wouldn't think this looks *that* bad (though it certainly wouldn't be anything to even glance at), but after seeing the far and away better graphical version already...
Yeah as I was pointing out, ports are rarely as good, as the original console the games were made for, but there are exceptions. I'm sure that if Wreckless was coded for the PS2, it would only take a slight hit in graphics, not the botched looking port we see here.
Ewww, very shitty. Will the gimps who buy this be graced with the lame ass grain and filters the Xbox version had to use to get the games graphics to look moderately decent?
Oh well, this is to be expected when you drop a game from a more powerful console to a lesser one. Question is are the graphics the result of raw power or did Wreckless have huge levels that would challenge the PS2's memory capcity? *-neo
For the sake of comparison:
PS2
Xbox
![]()
PS2
Xbox
![]()
PS2
![]()
Xbox
![]()
PS2
Now given that GTA3 looks like complete ass on PS2. Wouldn't you like to see what the Xbox could do with it? Look at these pics and dream.
yeah but look at the people in the one shot they dont even have animation on them theyre still in their bind poses im thinking these are early beta or even alpha shots of the game
but thats me
Bookmarks