Nobel Peace Prize Winner Says She Wants to Kill George W. Bush, Gets Standing Ovation

**nocturne** · 18 Jul 2007, 11:08 PM

Originally Posted by Thief Silver

If you're anti-gay, you're a bigot.

I think fat people having sex is gross, why don't we ban that too?

Well explain that to someone who is anti-gay.

**Othello Harrington** · 18 Jul 2007, 11:20 PM

Originally Posted by nocturne

Well explain that to someone who is anti-gay.

Just LOL, he already did, he had hope you'd learn something from it to, I suppose.

**nocturne** · 18 Jul 2007, 11:47 PM

Instead of carelessly flaming me, why don't you actually read the points i brought up.
I am not anti-gay just anti-gay marriage if only in the context of the word.

**icarusfall** · 18 Jul 2007, 11:56 PM

You keep saying 'flame'. I don't think you know how to use that word properly.

**catfish** · 19 Jul 2007, 12:05 AM

Originally Posted by nocturne

I am not anti-gay just anti-gay marriage if only in the context of the word.

im just wondering exactly why you are the one and not the other? is it for religious reasons, or just to be purposely objective?

**Vasteel** · 19 Jul 2007, 12:32 AM

Anyone who can claim that allowing gay couples to marry undermines the 'sanctity of marriage' (lol!) is clearly a closet homosexual.

Nocturne needs to face his fear, look within, and embrace the dick he craves.

**youandwhosearmy** · 19 Jul 2007, 03:17 AM

Originally Posted by nocturne

Instead of carelessly flaming me, why don't you actually read the points i brought up.
I am not anti-gay just anti-gay marriage if only in the context of the word.

First of all, stop saying carelessly flame. A lot of people are putting a lot of effort into flaming you and that term means its going unappreciated.

Second of all you need to define your position better.

So let me make it simple for you. Why don't you explain to me how the use of that word and the changing its definition to include the context of same sex unions will affect you in any way, shape, or form.

**James** · 19 Jul 2007, 03:43 AM

I wish I had the freedom not to care about the gays. If someone I know happened to be gay I'd be able to treat it with the same level of interest I'd give to their being vegetarian, or clog dancers. It'd be wonderful.

But no! Asshole politicians who can't go without the religious wacko vote have to turn it into a "Think of the children!" issue, and deny the gays their perfectly reasonable interest in having their unions recognized by law. That being stupid and wrong, I'm forced to either ignore something that's obviously arbitrarily discriminatory or have an opinion (and vote) on something I don't care about. It's not a tough choice.

James