Nope, and there is absolutely zero chance it is better than Resident Evil 4, though I expect it to be good.
Nope, and there is absolutely zero chance it is better than Resident Evil 4, though I expect it to be good.
So Orange Box for PS3 should get the same review as Orange Box for 360 which should be the same as Orange Box for PC?
That logic fails on so many levels. I don't want comparisons for games on other systems I may not own. When reviewing a Wii game, comparisons should only be made to other wii games.
What? No, the review for a given game on a given system should be given considering all games on all other current systems.
Why should Wii games only be compared to Wii games? If I have $60, and a Wii game gets a 9, and a 360 game gets a 7, but the 360 game is the better game, how the fuck am I supposed to know that?
First off, scores are useless imo.
Secondly, if we have to use scores, how is a 7 a better game than a 9, regardless of system. If your 360 game is truly better than the Wii game, that should be reflected in the score. A great game is a great game. An average one is an average one.
All I'm saying is that if I'm in the market for a specific racing game for the Wii (I'd rather chew glass), I'd want to know how it stacks up compared to the other racing games for the Wii. I couldn't care less about where it falls in the hierarchy of all racing games on all systems. Need for Speed Most Wanted may be the best (single player) racer ever, but if it isn't on the Wii, it doesn't really matter much does it.
to be fair though, you are a res evil fan, so its kind of a foregone conclusion. Just like a tes game for me would get extra points, but z&w is surprisingly very good, it took me a while to start it because of real world time constraints, but now that i have, i think its something that gets overlooked a lot more than it should by enthusiest sites like this one.
Originally Posted by Compass
Bookmarks