For Kevin Smith Fans: Ethics of the Death Star Battle, Revisited
*BIG FAT EPISODE II SPOILER WARNING* (sorry LordPerrin)
I was thinking about the famous "Death Star ethics puzzle" from Clerks while driving in my car the other day, in light of Episode II which I had just seen for the second time the night before.
For those of you unfamiliar with the issue, let me summarize. The Battle of Yavin in Episode IV, a.k.a. the First Death Star Battle, was undoubtedly a just battle. The Death Star was 100% evil, filled top to bottom with stormtroopers, Empire stooges, Grand Moff Tarkin and the like. So it was not unjust for the Rebels to blow it up, along with the thousands of people inside. But the Battle of Endor in Episode VI was fought over an incomplete Death Star, one filled with (presumably) construction workers, independent contractors, and neutral parties to the Rebel conflict. Before Episode II came out, one could argue that destroying the Death Star when all those thousands of non-combatants were on board was an unjust act.
But Episode II changes the debate! In Episode II, we learn that the Death Star was conceived and constructed not by neutral engineers and construction workers, but by the Geonosians, an unscrupulous insect race which had clearly sided with the Sith. The evidence supporting this conclusion is pretty indisputable: we learn that the Trade Federation's droids and ships were manufactured by the Geonosians, plus the architectural similarities between the Death Star and the TF's ships (not to mention the conversation between Count Dooku and the Geonosian leader during the big showdown with the Clone Troopers) are unmistakeable.
So Kevin Smith's ethical debate has been resolved: It was just for the Rebels to destroy the second Death Star, because it was created by the evil Geonosians.
Discuss.
The spirit of liberty is the spirit which is not too sure it is always right. -Learned Hand
"Jesus christ you are still THE WORST." -FirstBlood
Bookmarks