It's easier to hate than to think. Nintendo's press conference sucked, no question, but there's plenty of good both on the Wii right now and coming for it later. By all means, though, keep regurgitating the same tired bile instead of paying attention.
Things I saw at E3 that were good- Wario Land Shake, Major Minor's Majestic March, de Blob (possibly my personal favorite), and Mad World. Dangerous Creatures is looking interesting, and that Spray game from Tecmo might turn out pretty decent as well. This endless stream of Wii hate is utterly god-damn retarded.
James
The Wii has by far the worst lineup of the big three
Paying attention to six b grade games is worth a ball of shit...Sony and MS showed the same number and better in 4 minutes. And that's in addition to the other stuff that was elsewhere, like Mirror's Edge, Rage, etc
And PSN and XBLA kicked the crap out of WiiUnderwear
Last edited by Joust Williams; 18 Jul 2008 at 12:48 AM.
You are completely wrong, except for the bit on WiiWare. Which makes you only almost completely wrong.
James
Because evidently you enjoy Nintendo waving its dick in your face.I'm a Nintendo fan but it's not pissing me off.
The wii is more or less everything wrong with video games today. It's nothing but one huge ball of gimmicks that add nothing to the games. The reason this motion sensitive shit will go away in a generation or two is because it doesn't work. The thing is so underpowered it gets ports from a handheld. And the quality control is beyond non existent. The fact is 98% of wii games could be done on the 360 or ps3 with much, much better results.
But all this shit not only gets a free pass but praised, because its Nintendo. If Microsoft had done the same thing no one would have bought it. The truth is Nintendo doesn't care about you, they never did. So stop defending them, Nintendo is a big boy. They don't need you watching their back.
Is it? "Better results" is relative to many factors not dependent on which box you put the disk in. NOT FACT.The fact is 98% of wii games could be done on the 360 or ps3 with much, much better results.
That's an assumption with no possibility of evidence in this plane of reality, REM. If Nintendo had made something with no real defining qualities besides being the Nintendo version of the new big console, then Nintendo would very likely be in the same situation as the company was with the Gamecube. If Nintendo had made a gaming system more than $250, then it would have less appeal to most people. There are many if's.If Microsoft had done the same thing no one would have bought it.
Donk
Bookmarks