American Gangster

[haohmaru]

Ridley Scott, Russel Crowe, Denzel Washington?

Count me in. Nov. 2

http://www.americangangster.net/

[Razor Ramon]

The previews have me hooked on this movie. I hope it doesn't disappoint like Man on Fire did.

[Survival Kid]

Don't front. Man on Fire was good.

Besides, MoF was Tony Scott; this is Ridley Scott.

[Advocate]

Man On Fire was awesome. Plus it was one of those very rare. Better than the original remakes.

[Razor Ramon]

I was bored 45 minutes into the movie. If I'm bored by then, I find it impossible to pay attention to anything else in the movie.

[Space Pirate Roberts]

It had the worst case of MTV editing I've ever seen. They took a well-written, well-acted movie and made it unwatchable.

[Brand X]

Anyone who hates on Man on Fire sucks. Awesome gunfights, awesome torture, and a bomb shoved up a dudes ass. You can't lose. Even with the ADD editing.

[Advocate]

Fuentes: "I'm a professional."

Creasy: "Yeah everyone keeps telling me that."

--------------------------
Fuentes: "What about me?"

Creasy: "I'm sorry you just ... ran out of time."

[Korian]

Ridley Scott, Russel Crowe, Denzel Washington?

Count me in. Nov. 2

http://www.americangangster.net/

Don't forget about TIP.

[Drewbacca]

Anyone who hates on Man on Fire sucks. Awesome gunfights, awesome torture, and a bomb shoved up a dudes ass. You can't lose. Even with the ADD editing.

Good action writing. Boring directing (and therefore delivery). The only reason it was as good as it was is because Denzel's such a great lead. That's it. When people say they didn't like Man on Fire I understand why right away.